Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Senator Edward Kennedy — Part 24
Page 94
94 / 147
oo ODD Th wD DH eH
10
-~ }oo
o . > U
after she had ®@. her Civil Rights case. ® .
Aside from the problems of res judicata and the statute of
limitations, the events in cases CV 85-7003 and CV 85-7044 occurred
in San Diego County which is in the Southern District of Californiay,
not here in the Central District. Venue, therefore, would lie in
the Southern District. The allegations in CV 85-6613 simply do
not state any cause of action.
The complaints are garbled, rambling and unintelligible. It
is obvious that the actions are utterly frivolous and wholly in-
substantial. This Court, thus, has no jurisdiction. Franklin v.
11] Oregon, 662 F.2d 1337, 1342 (9th Cir. 1981). No amount of amending
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24||
25
26
27
28
could possibly cure these defects.
IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that the three complaints and
actions be dismissed.
DATED: November 21, 1985.
United States Magistrate
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic