Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Senator Edward Kennedy — Part 23
Page 154
154 / 249
It is evident from the face of the complaint
that this action is frivolous and it would be
a waste of time and money of all concerned
parties and abuse of judicial process to
‘permit this case to remain on the docket
any longer. (See attached Exhibit B, Deci-
sion of Judge DOOLING dismissing Carter
v. Platt et.al, 76Civ. 692, April 20, 1976).
Conclusion
For the reasons set forth above, the complaint should
be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be
granted.
PETER L. ZIMROTH
ROBERT M. PITLER
RICHARD M. SELTZER
Assistant District Attorneys
Of Counsel
Respectfully submitted,
ROBERT M. MORGENTHAU
District Attorney
New York County
Attorney for Respondent
155 Leonard Street
New York, New York 10013
(212) 732-7300
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic