◆ SpookStack

skeet *t is ws uG-18-1992 14:00 FROM 82023241848 P.@4 all reasonable inferences in that party's favor.'" Id. (quoting Griggs-Ryan v. Smith, 904 F.2d 112, 115 (ist Cir. 1990)). How- ever, once the moving party has made a properly supported motion for summary judgment, the adverse party ‘must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial." Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 250 (1986) (citing Rule 56(e), Fed. R. Civ. P.). In support of the instant motion, defendant Field, via affidavit, states that, following complaints from neighbors concerning noise, threats, and other aspects of plaintiff's behavior, he told plaintiff to quit the premises, which plaintiff did in September 1984, one month after the request. Field states that he did not use the judicial process to aid him, nor was he instructed by any other defendant, past or present, to evict plaintiff. fn response to the motion, plaintiff states "THAT THE EVICTION WAS THE ACT, BY FIELD, BY AND FOR THE OTHER DEFENDANTS, HE BECAME AN INSTRUMENT OF THE DEPRIVATION WILLING, WANTONLY AND MALICIOUSLY . .. - " Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law attached to Objection to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff also calls the affidavit "sheer fabrications" and demands that the “BURDEN [BE PLACED] ON THE DEFENDANTS TO OFFER 'PROOFS' IN A COURT OF LAW." Objection to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. ewe a