◆ SpookStack

eee » '” Memorandum C-l ° _ To : SAC, BOSTON (197-211) (P) Date 5/28/92 Subject: JOHN J. STARADUMSKY v. RONALD REAGAN; ET AL the information of SRA /92, PLA received a telephone call from MS. Legal Counsel Division, FBIHQ. MS.[___ladvised that she had received a cop January 23, 1992, which was from AUS ee Providence, R.I. to MS.[____] Deputy Clerk, United States_District Court, Concord, NH., regarding captioned lawsuit. mMs.[ __—_—i advised that in the letter, AUSA made reference to elephone conversation at_ he had with MS. on 1/22/92. More over, AUSAL______—*diyY: stated that it waS his understanding that the matter of STARADUMSKY v. REAGAN, civil action number 88-2000D had been dismissed against all parties including all Federal defendants. Moreover, AUSAL stated in the above mentioned letter that he understood that the suit was dismissed due to MR. STARADUMSKY’S not filing an amended complaint on 3/22/91. ms [| advised that she also conducted a review of the recent docket in the matter of STARADUMSKY v.WEST WARWICK, Et Al., Civil Action Number 90-CV-2000, which was obtained by SRA on 4/27/92 from MRS. U.S. DISTRICT COURT CLERK’S OFFICE, Concord, New Hampshire. MS. advised that she conducted a review of this docket, and noted docket entry number 18, dated 2/19/91, which notes among other things that civil action number 88-2000D was consolidated into civil action number 90-CV-2000 on 2/19/91. 1-Boston_ (197-911) JMC/amf (3)