◆ SpookStack

O fe The plaintiff has sued "everyone" from the executive, legislative and judicial branches of. the federal governinent. As The President and Mrs. Reagan are entitled to absolute immunity. This immunity does not depend on a parti¢ularized functional analysis and because the immunity is grounded in the constitution, it cannot be abrogated by statute. See Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731. This: immunity encompasses all actions of the President taken in his official capacity. The plaintiff for some unfathomable reason also names Mrs. Reagan as a defendant. There is little question Mrs. Reagan, individually could not have in any way caused. injury to, the plaintiff. The fact that he names her as a defendant should give the Court an indication of the profound ludricousness of the complaint. B. It appears the plaintiff also mentions the United States Attorney and other executive branch officers for failure to prosecute someone for something. Prosecutors enjoy a broad absolute immunity from personal ability for advocatory functions including whether to initiate prosecutions, (Imbler v.. ‘Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409); investigative functions (Imbler); administrative functions (Lavicky v.. Burnett, 758 F.2d 468 (10th Circ-1985). - c. Legislators (members of Congress) are protected by absolute immunity. They are protected by an immunity that is - - 7 sent oy seer