Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Senator Edward Kennedy — Part 21
Page 10
10 / 41
Plaintiff charges that, his case did/was directly influenced
by this police "Cranston Police Department", illegal interference
and that the plaintiff did after and was after advised by counsel
Moretti, that it was, because of this case, that he was charged.
Plaintiff charges that thereafter, this law firms attention to
this case did diminish, and that testimonv/witnesses,evidence,
depositions, in this case were never taken/entered in this matter.
Plaintiff also chargesthat the Defendant John Tomlinson, was
duly served with this Subpoena Duces Tecum, on June 22nd,1984,
and that this witness, as required by law, did never answer this
subpoena, and bring with him, records as requested, and that this
act was allowed and conspired with by the Commissioner, and appel-
ate commission, ( of which e=ts was one of the reasons of the
appeal), plaintiff charges and did charge that this,;appearance
with these records, would have proved perjury of his previous
testimony, and that this omission by commissioner Rotondi, to
enforce this appearance as pre=scribed by law, was in further
conspiracy, to deprive the plaintiff of his workers compensation
benifits, and any and all medical, re-training, and settlement
that would have been awarded. Plaintiff charges that all defendants
this count III, this paragraph j), did conspire/and plaintiff
further charges that this conspiracy did continue through, the
appellate commission hearing, of March 19th,1985, before which
do to lack'of counsels Moretti &Perlow Filing an eppeal, the
plaintiff did file on September i3th11984 (to protect his appell-
ate rights) plaintiff charges that counsels Moretti 5 Perlow,
Jeff Perlaw, defendants later filed a motion to withdraw, over
and above the plaintiffs objections. Plaintiff further charges
that the Defendant Gloria Hartmann was used, by these lawvers,
did provide information to them, and other-wise remove documents
in this case, and in some instances replace them with altered
Ones as discribed. Plaintiff charges that his audio taped con-
versations were altered, some by Gloria Hartmann, and others by
Gefendants Ray Garrity, and dther"john Does", she did/was
forced to provide keys to, including the West Warwick Police, bv
way of coeréion.
Plaintiff charges that he was harassed on the highways, on his
trips to Workers Compensation, By Defendant "John Does", did
make iweports to police, and was refused any investigation. And
that attempts were made to cover-up, close-up this Workers
Compensation case, prior to the " Kangaroo trial/hearing"he did
receive, and does intend“to prove this case.
Plaintiff charges all defendants this paragraph, an
III, with deprivation of his rights to 42 USCS séi
Richts uhder the law ~-Plaintifé a
ad this count
81 Equal
F
cO acues la fursher charges dirtv tricks
his transcript was altered and not as stated, for some reason
is tr itt did never
¢s¥up",.in his life,)"Yup" was used later as a means of
(45)
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic