◆ SpookStack

oe HE CAN NO LONGER EXPECT HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO A TRIAL IN ARD=ALL-WHOM we AND ARE USING THE sinsca Mroceacs OF THIS GOURT CASE/AND ALL PAST COURT CASES, ILLEGAL DENIAL OF THE PRESS ILLEGAL MISS-USE AND ABUSE OF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES STATE AND FEDERAL,AND ALL OTHER AS CHARGED ACTIVITIES OF MASSIVE INTERVENTION, ENTRAPMENT, ‘SURVEILLANCE OF THIS PLAINTIFF TO AGAIN GAIN ELECTIONS TO OFFICE BY THEIR CANDIDATES--~REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC, AT ALL ILLEGAL AND UN-CONSTITUTIONAL MEANS AT THEIR DISPOSAL------ TOTAL AND CORRUPT,FIXED,RIGGED ELECTIONS---— THAT THIS PLAINTIFF RESPECTFULLY DEMANDS THIS COURT CASE BE HEARD, A CHANGE OF VENUE FROM THIS STATE AND NEW ENGLAND, "IN FORMA PAUPERIS PROCEEDINGS", THESE RESTRAINING ORDERS, AND AS IS AND SHALL BE REQUESTED, "WRITS OF MANDUMUS" TO FORCE THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT AND ALL OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES TO INVESTIGATE AND HOLD ‘CRIMINAL TRIALS, FOR CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES OF THESE DEFENDANTS ET:3AL..-eceee ; APPLICABLE LAWS AND ARGUEMENTS FOR TRANSFER OF VENUE;; TE ane mame THAT THIS PLAINTIFF IS,AS A CITIZEN OF THIS UNITED STATES IRR-REGARDLESS OF FINANCIAL<--=-STATUS, ENTITLED TO ACCESS TO THIS FEDERAL COURT, AND OF AN ARENA AT WHICH HE MAY RECEIVE A FAIR AND ADEQUATE TRIAL....OF JURISTS NOT CONCERNED,INTERESTED, IN TO THE MATTERS--CHARGES OF THIS COMPLAINT. AND AS THIS PLAINTIFF IS SEEKING JUSTICE/COMPENSATIONS AGAINST THIS STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, POLITICAL LEADERS PAST AND PRESENT, ITS TWO PARTY SYSTEM, ITS CATHOLIC AND OTHER CHURCHES, ITS RELIGIOUS LEADERS, ITS POLICE, AND THE VERY NATURE OF HIS REQUESTS FOR DENIAL OF FEDERAL FUNDS INTO THIS STATE, AND CHARGES HE CAN PROVE AGAINST THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND JUDGES ET AL, HE CAN NOT/HAS NOT RECEIVED FAIR, EQUAL, ADBQUATE-=TRIALS IN THIS STATE OF RHODE ISLAND OVER THE COURSE OF YEARS........AND THAT HE HAS ALREADY BEEN INCARCERATED ONCE, ILLEGALLY AND HAS BEEN CONTINUOSLY BEEN DEPRIVED OF COUNSEES AND HIS RIGHTS TO ACT "PRO SE",AND RECEIVE FAIR AND EQUAL TREATMENTS UP TO AND INCLUDING THE " FEDERAL COURT--DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND " THIS STATE,AGAINST THESE DEFENDANTS, BY AN UN-BIAS, DIS-INTERESTED JURY, AND WITHOUT POLITICAL (FURTHER) INFLUENCES OF JUDGES BY POLITICAL PATRONAGE--FRIENDSHIP,AFFILIATIONS, INTERESTS, DUE TO THE VERY NATURE AND MASSIVE AMOUNT OF DEFENDANTS AND THEIR POWERS AND THAT HE IS ENTITLED TO A FAIR AND ADEQUATE TRIAL,IN AN ARENA THAT CAN HEAR THIS CASE UN-BIASEDLY, OF WHICH HE CAN,WILL PROVE THIS STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND NEW ENGLAND IS,NOT...HE THUSLY RESPECTFULLY DEMANDS THIS TRANSFER OF VENUE... .--e- PLAINTIFF CITES, "THAT THE CHOICE OF FORUM AND TRANSFER IS PLAINTIFFS ENTITLEMENT FOR A FAIR TRIAL" UNDER 28 USCS & 1404(a) NORWOOD v KIRKPATRICK (1955) 349 US 29,99 L Ed 789, 75 S CT 544, ~~ PLAINTIFFS CHOICE OF FORUM SHOULD N BALANCE IN DEFENDANTS FAVOR IS SHOWN BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING _ EVIDENCE. HEADRICK v ACCHINSON, T' & S, F, RAILROAD CO. (1950) VIDENCE. HEADRICK v ACCHINSON, T & S, F, RAILROAD CO. (1950 2 10 NM 182 F2d 305, (5) ~ yl 7.3 rs 2 Te a eee OF sete epee nnestn eT CFS ete, So CME ae *