Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Senator Edward Kennedy — Part 20
Page 37
37 / 249
U.S. GOVERNMENT, RONALD REAGAN ADMINISTRATION ET AL
DISTRICT COURT OF THE n®, STATES
a FOR THE DISTRICT s RHODE ISLAND ,
STARADUMSKY 70 58 7
JOHN J.
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND ET AL” = iY ES
REPUBLICAN PARTY, ET AL } . _ ; ‘OCT - 6 199
DEMOCRATIC PARTY, ET AL
‘CATHOLIC CHURCHES, ET AL 7 so ” CLERK
METHODIST CHURCH U. -
ES, ET AL nigra SERICT COUR
AND OTHER NAMED AND UN-NAMED DEFENDANTS - TOE {ot anir
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
" NOW COMES THE PLAINTIFF JOHN J. STARADUMSKY, IN THE ABOVE
ENTITLED CIVIL ACTION, AND RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS THIS TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER, PRIOR TO THE SERVICE OF THIS COMPLAINT. THE
PLAINTIFF REQUESTS. THIS AS PROTECTION FOR HIMSELF, HIS FAMILY
FRIENDS AND HIS CHILDREN, AS WELL AS WITNESSES IN THIS FEDERAL
CIVIL MATTER. PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT HE HAS AND IS BEING, ILLEGALLY
HARASSED AND INTIMIDATED ON A DAILY BASIS, AND BEING FOLLOWED
AROUND BY THE RELIGIOUS SECTS, NAMED AS DEFENDANTS IN THIS CASE,
AS WELL AS THE POLITICAL DEFENDANTS, WHO HAVE BY/AND THROUGH
THE POLICE DEPARTMENTS OF THIS STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, REFUSED
HIM HIS 14th AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF EQUAL PROTECTION TO SAME LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, AND FURTHER REFUSAL OF THE FEDERAL LAW .
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES TO INVESTIGATE INTO THIS STATE OF RHODE
ISLAND POLICE BLOCKAGE/HARASSMENT, INTIMIDATION.
PLAINTIFF CITES AGOSTO V. BARCELO, D.C. PUERTO RICO 1984
594 F. SUPP. 1390 AND 748 F. 2d 1. MANDAMUS GRANTED --prior
to response of initial pleadings, or appearance of defendants )
PLAINTIFF REQUESTS THIS RESTRAINING ORDER, EX-PARTE, TO
BE ISSUED TO THE DEFENDANTS, WITH SERVICE OF THIS COMPLAINT,
AND PRIOR TO ANY MOTIONS THEY MAY FILE IN DENIAL OF SAME
COMPLAINT, AND THE HEARINGS THEY MAY. REQUEST IN THEIR ARGUEMENTS
WHY THESE DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE RESTRAINED FROM HARASSING,
INTIMIDATING, MOLESTING, OR BOTHERING THIS PLAINTIFF,FRIENDS,
FAMILY, AND HEIRS, IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM.PLAINTIFF STATES
AGAIN THAT THESE/ THIS RESTRAINING ORDERS ARE FOR HIS SAFETY
AND PEACE OF MIND, AND PROTECTABLE UNDER THE 14th, AND lst
AMENDMENTS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.
. THEREFORE THE PLAINTIFF REQUESTS THAT THE DEFENDANTS AS
FOLLOWS BE RESTRAINING IN EVERY WAY,SHAPE, FORM AS DESCRIBED
FROM DEVIATING FROM FEDERAL &~STATE LAWS IN PROTECTION OF THE
CIVIL RIGHTS OF CAW ABIDING CITIZENS, AS THIS PLAINTIFF, AND
THUS GUARANTEEING TO THIS SAME PLAINTIFF ALL HIS CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHTS, AND RESTORING TO HIM, HIS ACCESS TO THE COURTS AND
LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OF THIS STATE AND COUNTRY, WITHOUT
HARASSMNET, INTIMIDATION, THREATS, VANDILISM, HARM, ASSAULTS,
AUTO-MOBILE ACCIDENTS, ETC., NOR TO HIS FRIENDS,FAMILY, AND
CHILDREN.
tee. -
(1) 2. wy tee oa ee GEE
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic