◆ SpookStack

EXCESSIVE BAIL SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED, NOR EXCESSIVE FINES BE EMPOSED, NOR CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENTS INFLICTED. AND. IN VIOLATION OF THE PLAINTIFFS 7TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, IN THAT HE WOULD BE INCARCERATED ON A CIVIL AND NOT A CRIMINAL CHARGE.. AS DEFINED TO HIM, BY COUNSEL FOR THE STATE, DEFENDANTS MICHAEL FAVICCHIO,AND COUNSEL CHARLES RENNICK ESQ.--- PLAINTIFF CITES THE 7TH AMENDMENT--TRIAL BY JURY IN CiVib CASES-- IN SUITS AT COMMON LAW,WHERE-THE VALUE. IN CONTROVERSY SHALL EXCEED TWENTY DOLLARS, THE RIGHT OF TRIAL BY JURY SHALL BE PRESERVED. .ceeseeces PLAINTIFF THEREFORE DEMANDS, A TRIAL BY JURY BEFORE ANY ATTEMPT DEMANDS THAT THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND PROVE THAT HE DID WILLFULLY REFUSE TO PAY THIS CHILD SUPPORT, WITH AN ABILITY TO PAY... ++ +2 AND IF THIS CHARGE IS A CRIMINAL CHARGE AND ATTEMPT OF INCARCER- ATION, IS PLANNED/ATTEMPTED, PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT IT IS IN VIOLATION OF HIS 6TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, .~.--RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED-~-~-- IN ALL CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS, THE ACCUSED SHALL ENJOY THE RIGHT TO A SPEEDY AND” PUBLIC TRIAL, BY AN IMPARTIAL JURY JURY OF THE STATE AND DISTRICT WHEREIN THE CRIME SHALL HAVE BEEN COMMITTED...... HOWEVER PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT DUE TO " ANIMUS INTENT " THIS STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, HE DEMANDS AN IMMEDIATE CHANGE OF VENUE, FOR THE PROTECTION OF HIS 14th AMENDMENT RIGHTS---CITIZENSHIP-~-DUE PROCESS OF LAW--EQUAL PROTECTION. PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT HE CAN NOT RECEIVE A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL TRIAL, IN THIS STATE. A) THAT AS RELIEF IN THIS COUNT, I & II, THE PLAINTIFF DEMANDS THAT THE STATE REPLY, WITH ITS RIGL'S PERTAINING TO STATUTES, WHICH COULD/WOULD ENABLE THE FAMILY COURT, TO; 1) UNILATERALLY, SEPARATE AND APART FROM THE U.S.CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, PASS ANY LAW, WHICH WOULD INCARCERATE ANY PERSON , INCLUDING THE PLAINTIFF, WITHOUT A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL HEARING/TRIAL. B) UNILATERALLY,SEPARATE AND APART FROM THE U.S. CONSTITUTTIONAL® LAW, PASS ANY LAW,WHICH WOULD INCARCERATE ANY PERSON, INCLUDING THE PLAINTIFF, WITH OUT THE "RIGHT TO COUNSEL ".A PROTECTED CIVIL RIGHT, UNDER 42 USCS&1983----RIight to counsel. Satan 2) THAT THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, CEASE AND DESIST FROM ALL ILLEGAL COURT HARASSMENT, INTIMIDATION, IN THE FORM OF MALICIOUS PROSECTION, MALICIOUS ABUSE OF PROCESS.....-- protectable undér 424SCS&1983 AND PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT ANY AND ALL COURT ORDERS, (CHILD SUPPORT $76.00 WEEKLY) WAS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION---WITH JUDGE JERMIAH, ACTING UNDER "COLOR OF THE LAW ", IN IMPOSING SAME IN A CONSPIRACY, TO 1) DEPRIVE THE PLAINTIFF OF HIS PIGHTS TO A FAIR HEARING ON THE MERITS TO PAY 2) GROSS DENIAL~APPELLATE+* RIGHTS - 3) REFUSAL TO HEAR MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION.4)CONSPIRING WITH COUNSELS FOR THE STATE, PLAINTIFF, AND DEFENDANT GLORIA HARTMANN, WITH FULL KNOWLEDGE, THAT THE PLAINTIFF DID NOTHAVE THE ABILITY TO PAY THIS AMOUNT OF 76.00 WEEKLY, WITH INTENT OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, BY WAY OF INCARCERATION. 4) TOTAL CONSPIRACY TO COVER-UP JUDICIAL CONSPIRACY AND MAL_PRACTICE OF JUDGE O"BRIAN, GENDRON, CROUCHLEY, BY NOT ALLOWING CUSTODY HESRING. 128)