◆ SpookStack

7 a of$S76.00 weekly, of which hecould not and has not been able to pay. Plaintiff charges conspiracy, in this shuffling, of Court matters, and charges Judge Jermiah, Joseph Marran Esq., Charles Rennick, Esq., with conspiring to obstruct justice, blackmail the plaintifr, at present with threats of jail at the ACI, RI, and totaluy applying this amount arbitrarily and « without adequate hearing, solely to deprive the plaintiffodf his Civil and Constitutional Rights, to rile this Compiaintin Federal Court, have it heard, and file any "WRIT OF MANDUMUS" requests for forced investigation into ali criminal harrassment and intimidation, pertaining to this Complaint, by the FsI/ Justice Department. as per requests this count and this complaint. vlaintiff states that this appeal is still pending, and has never been heard.(Plaintiff later jailed,2/17/88 to 2/26/88-~ILLEGALLY) AJ ThatPlaintift charges on April 13th, 1987, the Defendant Gloria Hartmann, was served with a Miscellaneous Complaint/ _ Complaint tor the commencement od proceedings to determine Custody.thHis complaint has never been answered, by counsel for the defendant Joseph Marran, Esq., or by the defendant Gloria Hartmann. RI Family Court 87-1221M. B) That plaintiff did file Interrogatories to the defendant Gloria Hartmann, and Défendant State of RHode Island, in - both 87-0090, and 87-2221M, both nave never been answered, * On May 22nd,1987, a "Motion To Strike" Interrogatories, was granted By the Defendant Judge Gendron, Per Rule 1l, plaintiff Objecting, with a copy of "Rule 11; in his hand. Defendant Judge Gendron, Did refuse to look at "Rule ll" and relate to the Plaintiff " Don't you tell me what Rule ll States, " MOtion to Strike Granted." Plaintiff states that Family Court, Rules of Practice, e "Rule 1l1,--Motions for Continuations on grounds of absence of material witness." Plaintiff states that there is nothing in Rule 11, that did pertain to striking Interrogatories. Bl)Plaintiff charges that on June 2nd,1987, he did file in Family Court, State of RI, a Notice of appeal, of this granting of Motion to Strike, By Defendant Judge Gendron, he was forced to have it approved by the same Judge Gendron, and it was denied. Plaintiff challanges the Constitutionality, of the same Judge, approving, dis~approving an appeal on his decision, it is tatamount to censureship, and gross denial of the appellate procedure.(This denial, was for costs of appeal, in forma pauperis, which was with attached affidavit) B2)That on June 2nd, he did also file a"Motion,EX_PARTE for Service In Forma Pauperis" also with attached Affidavit in support, he was sent to Judge Crouchley, for this matter, this was denied. Plaintiff being destitute at this filing. B2)Plaintiff£ Charges that on June 4th,1987, he did retain Charles Rennick,Esq., as counsel, and that it was an understanding, that the plaintiff did seek only a custody suit,and hearing, (15)