◆ SpookStack

b) Cc) da) REPORTED ON-INVESTIGATED, BUT WAS IN THE ALTERNATIVE GAGGED --UP. PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT IN FOLLOW UP TEEEPHONE CALLS, TO CHECK ON THIS COMPLAINT, AND HIS REQUEST FOR EXPOSURE OF THIS HARASSMENT RNp INTIMIDATION, HE WAS GIVEN THE RUN~-AROUND BY THIS PAPER AND ITS PERSONEL. PLAINTIFF FURTHER CHARGES THAT ON OR ABOUT AUGUST 13th,1987 HE DID REQUEST AGAIN FROM THIS PROVIDENCE JOURNAL AN ARTICLE/ STORY, ON HIS THEN FILED FEDERAL COURT CASE, 87-0411P, BUT WAS AGAIN REFUSED ANY NEWS EXPOSURE, IN THIS PROVIDENCE JOURNAL..-.. PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT ON AUGUST 8th,1986, HE DID SEND BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO THE DEFENDANT BOSTON HERALD AND AGENT FOR KEVIN CONVEY, ALSO DEFENDANT, SAME COMPLAINT/REQUEST FOR FREEDOMS OF THE PRESS. PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT AGAIN GAMES WERE PLAYED WITH HIM, DURING TELEPHONE CALLS ENCOMPASSING , APPROXIMATELY TWO WEEKS, WITH NO PRESS, INVESTIGATION, INQUIRY WHATSO EVER.«--+eeressecee PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT ON AUGUST 8th,1986, HE DID SEND BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO THE DEFENDANT BOSTON GLOBE, SAME COMPLAINT, REQUEST FOR FREEDOMS OF THE PRESS. PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT AGAIN GAMES WERE PLAYED WITH HIM, DURING TELEPHONE CALLS ENCOMPASSING APPROXIMATELY TWO WEEKS, WITH NO PRESS, INVESTIGATION, INQUIRY WHAT SO EVER... cccsccccccecscccsesrerc® PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT ON APRIL 6th,1987, HE DID FURTHER, SEND ADDITIONAL REQUESTS/COMPLAINTS TO WPRI TV-~CHANNEL 12, DEFENDANT, AND GLEN LAXTON AGENT FOR ALSO DEFENDANT. {.AND TO ABC NEWS, 20/20 ---NOT YET DEFINED AS A DEFENDANT) INCLUDING SAME,CQMPLAINTS AS MENTIONED ABOVE..REQUESTING FREEDOMS OF THE PRESS. PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT AGAIN HE WAS DENIED, THIS FREEDOM OF THE ~ BRESS. PLAINTIFF FURTHER CHARGES THAT HE DID LATER PLACE TELEPHONE GALLS, TO WPRI-CHANNEL 12, WITH NO RESPONSE TO HIS COMPLAINT/ REQUEST FOR THIS SAME FREEDOM OF THE PRESS/NEWS MEDIA. PLAINTIFF CHARGES ALL OF THE ABOVE DEFENDANTS, BOSTON GLOBE, BOSTON HERALD, PROVIDENCE JOURNAL, WPRI -TV, WITH REFUSING TO PRINT, DENYING FREEDOMS OF THE PRESS, IN CONSPIRACY WITH ALL POLITICAL DEFENDANTS AS CHARGED, AND THE RESPECTIVE REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC PARTIES, IN PROTECTION OF SAME DEFENDANTS...--+-+- PLAINTIFF CHARGES BY WAY OF THIS REFUSAL/ AND DENIAL OF THIS BASIC CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF THIS PLAINTIFF--FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY WAY OF THIS FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, HE WAS GREIVIOUSLY DENIED HIS HUMAN RIGHTS,AND CIVIL RIGHTS THERAFTER, AND WAS SUBJECTED TO EXTREME AND CRUEL,POLICE, JUDICIAL, POLITICAL, RELIGIOUS ,MENTAL ANGUISH, PAIN, SUFFERING, IN THE FORM OF UN-RELENTING HARASSMENT AND INTIMIDATION DAY IN AND DAY OUT---IN THIS STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND MASSACHUSETTS. PLAINTIFF THEREFORE CHARGES THESE DEFENDANTS OF THE PRESS AND NEWS MEDIA, WITH ALLOWING AND AIDING AND ABETTING By ACTS OF OMISSION OF THIS FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, IN ALL ACTS OF-TERRORIZATION IN HIS LIFE AS CHARGED ALL COUNTS THIS COMPLAINT, ALL COUNTS, AFTER THE DELIVERY TO THEM AS STATED ABOVE.. PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT BY WAY OF GRANTING FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, OF HIS JUSTIFIABLE AND PROVEABLE REQUESTS INTO ZHE VIOLATIONS. OF HIS CIVIL RIGHTS, ALL HARRASMENT, INTIMIDATION, FURTHER CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, WOULD HAVE/COULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED... «+++... (159)