◆ SpookStack

a rey -~ ont _ nee procedures: for the ‘vindication _ ZT RITA areas re! is “impossible fo. ‘disagree with - (mats Reéardon’s * conclusion that? shay pe = vamRE STR .““grave constitutional questions” were™. . ‘raised_by ‘the senatér wher he said : ‘the: ‘inquést would depriye him of his." FS full rights of representation by. coun-. :-sel, of confrontation and. cross-exam-. ination of hostile witnesses, to present “ “ evidence. in. his own, behalf and to. town behalf. ot oe oe » Itis trie that the inquest, law ‘doés : ‘eee, * eee b. a8 one-sided preliminary inquiry by £ egal authorities rather than a ¢rim-" E.compel attendance of witnesses in’ nc his, ; q- ph ‘hot expressly ‘gtant these rights,. and | “that they have not- been ‘afforded | witnesses’ in past inquests. An. in-; £ quest j is supposed to be investigatory . final trial. But again, the senator had ; . a right to test whether such an in- i quiry, especially ° ‘since it.was to be- + open: tovthe press, would conform to. ee “eurrent constitutional - standards _ of - - = legal representation and due process _ af aw, Tne . Hoey 7 Pal ~ . Fret AKenned exercised good’ political’, Only time will ‘ell whether “gen.” * judgment: in heading off a proceed- , zing that might have cleared the air, ="But it cannot be said that he™ Was ~ wrong to avail ‘himsélf of éxisting’ Agtnisights wef arerant ate Aictavar feet eto “E tate LI eet ae REST int