◆ SpookStack

they: held ne ; power reinvve them as t F ~ 7 ‘# Chairman. Blnghom: 4 oe piliae witli ‘the ‘case, ° hat ue ey a om tu Why: ent. they ea terch ; “all the: ‘cbr tha exer. t i it “heniber, aer “thie M sat fave ; through the. cage . a we should DB tlecide wh whether wn are 0. tonsidér. security. risk. IF we. to stick to loyalty {as atest], let's fo loyalty as it ig written down, In ittuls of the public there! would be erence. 3a * here followed a. discussion ‘of « th of a State Department shown by the..réco for two years in 4 emploroywhe ive There: Was only one member ‘bf: Board] rf ednfranted, all of ‘the wt” Bo fo ” etal occasiprs, breign country nesses, After thé first hearing or twe! one Board membey in the State Denack: } ment was sent oti 4 missivit to Gibraltar, ~ ¥ gram for two and one- hal “ 4 against him. Mee “Now that, primarily, as f vt ofl 4. Hons was so that the service, reCOr ‘ of Jey -{t, at the time we ‘put it in the: tion, rather than a discharge for toyulté, . ‘hut it has come to my attentiqa that the State Department, throughout the pro- yells, has not gr some other place, and thei after the - , discharged A single person on the grounds rfext hearing. unother member of. the § wag given some other duty, “Also, , "3 at particular tase as 1 redd_ the. testhuiony; a Where the thalnnah of the Stat : Depiet Board: of Joyalty. What they de ts ta bring the emiploye in and say: ‘Now, we aie going thete were SEY>, «to file charges ayuinst you ubless you Ftestg 7 so the man, sfealnsy or they fl hole a | hearing ancl being bint ii i treabout to My while in State, Cea ed ploy. ap At 466; Boatd member, in iy, that ne seal ne a te th eee i the State ull ys o ¥ ie Perkins: “1 wou say he Wwas,: rancer. vit Service Commis-: ' 1. (the, State ‘De- » ved Awiths* the | loyal; perfectly shent ~ poade off ‘the fe . pve in stiidying the case~whal erking, a0. ‘of the incumbent to Covermest, and. he's a. tafe » which iy, qi go pie fi 8 anid: ermittéd the wife .: present ‘during «2 all the heat Ayu to coich fy her fsa, Hand on what the ad that case, also; he | Boord , a probably dot o 5 chelrman Bingham: said Ja the sida - Ait. That was apalast the nla” be ms 7 “shart . Twok member: “eit,” and they've u ‘they normally waul the * of of ineligibility against you rondon ae you 7 “resign! I have called their attention twos 5 -or three times to the fact that. that: seen ‘tion was put in theresfor the protection“. of the employe, but they have’ taken the’ opposite position, and , say, * folks put it have caused seven pe i to resign where. pi ‘Lei ’ Gone! in tinder the Present riled aM mate ‘i a *, agi sBut yi 5 fal. i, employers, a4 tothe. Clvit ‘Lees "No, ie wire ie johns that And the ‘itgtua: ¢ it, oa that wa! cominitting a. fraud. on.. thé yng ii i bound, to ea him 3 as a. he fact that ‘You've got to tell, 8. y Board thembers [iti the' Statd D er to behave themselves a etn disuustich look « r ow! ey rt Me lope.” 1X, Bows au a practice which ¢ the Mie sbatine : 4 as pursued pore vingrously than, an other agency; fn our, tegulutiond gve sh i: " ‘ide that after. the. hearing bhency ¢ dlai'}; “When they operate Pa they dommere. - mong 4 ly showing a resignation of the individual: ,: i ond he hag this copy from the. State De-) - ' partment—he imin $ another agency and says, ‘I. iately, goes over: iy : ave Wworke for the State Department for, five yp fe Here’s my ‘Personnel Action Sheet, .tigned a few weeks ago.’ There 19. ath ing on the Personnel Action Sheet i and (elf tin there. We're gold to You, iy it” that. way, ahd: have. . Hohe on. the personnel officer that there’ : ath: ins” vs f-fobs, ¥ t & inaheni Ho informed wher : » a eres suitable in > is not beso uhy Peon to 80 bck on Briginal action.” Bines Mitchell, member of the Civil ' a te Fon ission: ."That ig correct. amiss Pe Fai “But we dg frequently | ang ta the attention of the employ-- Mi *:agency. information .which comes nv eis and which we think they should — ape. He "could be placed ‘under charged. L that ard dismissed | for unsuitable N aduct ap B Mr. Lee: “It would | ike thee or + four dts to get rid of employes that yay.” tsk Perkins: “Not unless he’s a:vet. . : Ai. It would be no trouble at all.” Bite Loyalty, Review Board turned to Migciisston of other loyalty cuses in thd fi fe Department. What follows is an — Board, | utc utider initiating ine oun Ps it ine tha he first lass. 4 ahd “where my P pe to te i Baye ; owrence V. Meloy, execulive secre- yey; “In the third case we found that the Re be Department had a hearing and that Roly the chairman, Mr. Snow [Conrad e Show], sat through the entire hear- ‘ ~probably three—but the other mem- he and ong pets of the Board changed FEGRUARY t, iter ° JOSEPH McCARTHY, SENATOR FROM WISCONSIN peron. He gets ot the person: may be’ interested him.) | Haris & boving He read the secret minutes