◆ SpookStack

Allegations by Senator icCarthy Case No. 73 ~ "This individual is in the Foreign Service. He was born in 1913, practiced law from September 1936 to September 192. He was With the Board of Economic Warfare fran November 192 to September 1913. He has been with the State Department as a senior economic analyst from September 193 until the present time. He was an applicant for a position es Foreign Service career officer. An investigative report dated June 197 disclosed that he has always associated with know leftists and was highly recommended by four well-known fellow travelers. While in California his closest associates for several years were two active Communists, A former law associate for this individual refused to recommend him for Federal employment, stating he was extremely far to the left. A memorandum in his file dated December 12, 1916, requested investigation of black-market activities on his part in Spain. le report on this point, however, has been made available, 4 superior court judge in California, who has knowm the subject well, stated that under no circunstances would he recommend him for a Government position, because of his extreme leftian, and that he would not have him in any responsible Government position. Another California judge said this individual associated closely with fellow travelers, and he would definitely not recommend him. This individual, to the best of ay knowledge, is still in Foreign Service, stationed in Madrid, Spain.* af Ht amy OE a H 7 uy aL Se ee ran “3 Possible Identification ae: not been investigated by the Bureau. There is no subversive derogatory information in the Burean files identifiable with his except for information which was furnished to the Bureau on & very tial bas on January 29, 1918. who was referred to as "Case Oe 91%, substan same as that alleged by Senator McCarthy which is set forth above. It is noted that photostatic coples of the testimony of Hamilton Robinson, Director, Office of Control, Division of Security Investigations, State Department, before the House Appropriations Comittee on January 28, 1918 contained the following: “case #91, rere rst according to Lee's list) not now employed; applicant resigned November 12, 191,7 pending further investigatione® 62~3979-1109) » §7C6,0