Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Sen Joseph Joe Mccarthy — Part 28
Page 26
26 / 46
1950
will have all the cooperation J can give
&. TI shall be more than happy to go
before the Appropriations Committee
and give it all the information Ihave. I
think the Appropriations Committee
should certainly look into the question
especially so in the cart of the Voice of
America,
I think the Voice of America Program
is a very important program ff property
conducted. I think it fe almost impos-
sible to spend too much Money on it if
the money Is wisely spent. but I think the
picture which we find in connection with
the New York office of the Voice of Alner-
ica should be examined by the Appro-
priations Committee and that that com-
mittee should use a bright light and find
out exactly what is going on. I shall
cover that matter in some detail when I
get down to the final case.
Mr. CAPEHART., Mr. President, will
the Senator yield?
Mr, McCARTHY. f yieid.
Mr. CAPEHART. Is it not a fact that
it had not been for a congressional
committee Alger Hiss would not have
been convicted? at
Mr. McCARTHY. I think there is no
@oubt about that. The Senator will re-
eal) that at the time the House Un-Amer-
fean Activities Committee turned up the
tmformation on Hiss the President said,
in a public statement, “We had all this
information already.” J do not know
whether he had It, but Lf st that time the
Un-American Activities Committee had
@ecided to quit, Hiss might have been in
Calcutta, instead of Service which might
not have been too bad.
Mr. CAPEHART. Is tt not reasonable
to assume that in the file of Mr. Hiss
there are possibly some good points as
well as derogatory evidence?
Mr. McCARTHY. I think even the
* most fanatical Communist may treat his
wife and children well: he msy provide
for them well. I do not think that is the
question. The question is whether these
persons are a threat to the United States.
No matter how much good t-formation
there may be in the file regarding them,
go jong as they are Joyal to Russia and
to the Communist Party, and disloyal to
this Government, I think they have no
right to hold Government position. I
think it is a privilege to bave a Govern-
mnent job, nota right.
Mr. CAPEHART. Is t not a fact that
every dan who has been ¢onvieted pos-
wbly had some good points about him,
and there were some persons who would
testify that he was a kindly and an.
honest man?
onl McCARTHY. That is certainly
¢
Mr. CAPEHART. I did not quite
understand the srgument which was
wsed a little earlier, that there might be
gome good points in the files. What
difference does it make how many good
points there are if the persons involved
are Communist sympathizers and fellow
fwavelers? Our jails are filled with per-
sons who were perfectly honest°up to
the time they performed the acts or deeds
which got them convicted. Is not that
truc?
Mo. 45—1
that it is not my task to take 81 cases
and try and get all the evidence end
then determine whether the intelligence
unit which evaluates it was doing a good
or a bad Job. All I am doing is pre:
senting enough of the picture so that
I hope both the Democratic side and
the Republican side will forget politics’
and help clean house. I think this is
somiething in which we cannot think of
politics as usual. Tf 7 were to give my
Democratic friends some advice, tt would
and do some house cleaning. I notice
the Senator from Mississippi frowning.
I do not think he was present when I
made it clear that if the Democratic ©
Party as represented in the Senate had
contro] of the executive branch I thought ©
we would not have the sorry picture we
‘have todey.
Mr. WHERRY. Mr, President, will the
Senator yield?
Mr. McCARTEHY. Certainly.
Mr. WHERRY, Is it not a fact, to
bod this all down, that the distinguished
Senator from Wisconsin is simply ask-
“tng that an appropriate committee of
the Senate make a thorough tnvestigna-
tion not only of the files but of any other ‘
source of information possible, and let
that committee determine whether
there are any disloyal persons or Com-
munists, ot what have you, such as the
Senator has listed in these 81 cases?
Is not that the whole crux of the maj-
ter?
Mr. McCARTHY. That is correct.
Mr. WHERRY. Whether there are
good things or bad things to be said
about them, aJ] the Senator is doing
fe asking thet an investigation be made
by an appropriate committee of .the
Benate. Whether that is correct pro-
eedure or not, the Senator is within his
rights in asking {t.
Mr. McCARTHY. That is correct. I
do not think a Benate committee can
do a complete job uniess the President
wil] make the facts avallabie.
Mr. WHERRY. Whether an investi-
gation will accomplish the very thing
which the distinguished Benator from
Connecticut (Mr. McManon] abr
about will depend on whether all the
information in the files is forthcoming to
the investigating committee.
Mr. McCARTHY. That is correct. I
do not clatm that all the cases I am re-
porting to the Senate refer to persons
Working in the State Department, but in
view of the fact that most of them were
in the Btate Department and had top-
secret clearance, I think the Senate could
call them before a committee and find
out in what Government Work they are
now engaged, or, if they are not engaged
fm Government work, what they have
been doing in private employment, and
whether they are members of espionage
rings. I am not concerned with the
Bumbers over which the Senator from
Tilmois labored all night long. whether
there are 205 or 57. Tt t& a question of
whether there are Communists tn the
State Department. As to three of them
the record is sc bad that I can find notb-
er
C
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE
Mr. McCARTHY. I take the position -
Senator yield? :
Mr. McCARTHY. I yield. -
Mr. WHERRY. Has the distingttished
‘Committee on Appropriatiqns relative te
: distinguished Benator mentioned
be that I think we should get together . oe the
better job. I ahould like to state
all other committees fail, I believe
. Committee on Appropriations would be 8 bes
a
“wery good place to start, because
priations are withheld from a depart-
ment or an agency, it can be brought
like him to know now that at any time —
at all, tomorrow or the next day, or
whenever he wants me to do so, I shall
’ be glad to come to his committee and
. give him all the information I have. f
believe the committee should decide after
further and complete investigation, and
after they have asked the President for
the files, which of the names they wish
to make public.
Wr. DONNELL. Mr. President, will
the Benator yield?
Mr. McCARTHY. I yield.
Mr. DONNELL. I understood the
Senator to say that he had made an offer
to the President of the United States.
Will the Senator state what that offer
wes and how it was made? -
Mr. McCARTHY. I shall be giad to
From Nevade I sent a telegram
e President. I was out there mak-
was the Senator making?
Mr. McCARTHY. A Lincoln Day
speech.
Mr. WITHERS. I thought the Bena-
‘tor said it was a Republican sperch,
Mr. McCARTRY. We call it # Lin-
coln Day speech.
Mr. WILEY. The appellations are
synonymous.
Mr. McCARTHY. T sent a telegram
to the President saying, in effect, “Mr.
President, I have the names of 57 tn-
dividuals in the State Department who
are Communists, and those names are
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic