Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Sen Joseph Joe Mccarthy — Part 23
Page 63
63 / 64
io
Bebo. ie roo | =
—_—_
McCarthy Makes New.
Threat fo Give Hames
Of Security ‘Risks’ ’
His Demands Rejected
By State Department as
‘Political Stratagem’
Senator McCarthy, Republican,
of Wisconsin renewed today a
name-cailing threat that the
State Department described yes-
terday as “holding .hostage the
reputation and rights” of employes
cleared of disloyalty charges.
The department brusquely re-
jected as a “political stratesem”
Senator McCarthy's demand for
assurance that 29 of its employes
are beligs kebl away from secrpt
Maners.
The Genatir threatened in la
letter Secretary of Stale
Acheson "Monday to name publicly
29 versons he said face lovalty
checks unless ne got such assur-
ance.
“Tam inelinec to think IT have
no coocice but to name them un-
less the State Department com-"
pletely reverses its stand,” Sen-
ator McCarthy said today. “The
situation is too dangerous noi to
do so.”
Humelsine Answers Charges.
Depuly Undersecretary of State:
Carusie H. Humelsine wrote the
Senator yesterday that his allega-
tion that the 29 persons he named
are involved in pending ioyalty
cases “is incorrect.”
All of the individuals have bee
namedaby Senator McCarthy b
fore. M®. Humelsine pointed ou
He adddd that some are net Stat
Department employes. some al;
bewllearess of the allegations
against them,” Mr. Humeisine
told the Senator. t
He said the deparirment “does
not permit any employe to have
_ access to secret mateMial when
it has Getermined that such ac-
, Ces might constitute a danger io
| the security of the United States.”
’ Details of Program Outlined.
But the President's loyalty pro-
| gram directive of March 13. 1948,
, precludes the furnishing of any
| “reports, records or files relative
to the loyalty of employes,” Mr.
, Humelsine said.
‘, His letter to Senator McCarthy
outlined details of what he de-
‘scribed as a “total security pro-
‘gram” conducted by the Staite
. Department, Under this program,
-an employe does not have to te
found positively disloyal to be
‘discharged. Mr. Hunelsine em-
Phasized that amy individual con-
‘sidered a “security risk” is sep-
| arated.
| But he stressed that “we wil]
neat compromise our legal and
“ethical responsibilities under pres-
‘sure of political strategem or
threat.”
Senator McCarthy chareed that
ready have been cleared and some: ‘ir. [Jjmeisine's leer was “de-
(Continued F.-om First Page.)
ibeyalely calculated to mislead.”
He Was not certain when ke may
make his next move. He gaid he
‘Imay name the 29 either th{s weex
or next.
area (he weernanecc throavek tha lat ae
Alt APL PLUS S LAL Lar ay —_—_—— — e
alty program.”
“Your indiscriminate lumping
together of names and the threat
{to make them public is tanta-
|
9 holding beste ic
|reputation and rights cf inose
employes who have been or may
}———
weds
Tolrsur _.
Ladd .
Clegg
Ghaveu
Nichols
Roser.
Tracy ;
Hark.
Alden
Belost ;
Leughiin
Mob:
Tele. Rosm..
NOT RECORDEGB
1450 ual
G lye
eR
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic