Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Sen Joseph Joe Mccarthy — Part 21
Page 3
3 / 91
. P 201RPUR -
‘ a "Ladd _
: ' Clegg.
. Glavin
: BN Nichols
t . Rosen
a Tracy
© Harbo
; : Belmont
w 9 Z Mobr
nn t P ; .
PeTators OLeCCLEGII eee. Room
. aan Nease
. * + t .
By Marquis Childs Gand
* ee ee se _ — r ee
- . See HERE ARE many, including | -
; Immunity And Discipline— some Senators themselves, who |
' _ THY. DAMAGE suffered by ine) Cleve the Senate has stftefed fe “
i dividuals who fall vietim to reck- In his Commentaries on the dgmage from the McCarthy faf- avy. is ,
i iets and irresponsible behavior | COWSticurion the eistinguished fair. This includes Republicans ( le 1 ot
cis done under the cloak offeongres- | American jurist, Joseph Story, ; Wi0 have disassociated =them- a
: sinta immunity ccc vq | Held that while the legislator ! selves from the McCarthy at- /
i is bon m ediately i" | was privileged to make the ‘cks. ea:
s apparert. The | Speech, publication of It would Under the Constitution the ‘
: damage to our ' subject him to a charge of libel. . Senate and the House have the
jastitutions is Story wrote: ‘ authority to make their own
. pot $0 apparent. ' “No man ought to have the rules. This includes the right
‘ But it is none- right to defame others under the fo expel a member for improper
é theless real and color of a performance of the behavior by a two thirds vote.
H fi raises seme | duties of his office. And if he— Improper behavior has been
t disturbing ques- | ' does so in the actual discharge taken to mean a crime of the first
t ; tiaas about what | ‘ of his duties in the Congress magnitude, such as treason or
: * Fras been hap- Ma | that furnishes no reason why he. Some act of moral turpitude. In
ui ! ‘pening during nll — ; should be able, through the me- recent years two members of the
: \ recent weeks as Childs _ dium of the press, to destroy the enate vele fipelled, but they
$ ww, J indiseriininate charges, Several | oF other citizens. It is neither : 1
= sof the injured individuals have; withia the scope of his duty nor paigns, Although they had been
i \ challenved the Senator to say } in the furtherance of public allowed to take their seats in the
: We <. | without the protection of his eon- | rights or public policy. Every Se eta ee nclneae becaue
; t: gressional immunity what he has | Oren has as good a right to be of the suspected fraud rause
‘Lsald under that privilege. While Brotected by the la - .
al secining to meet this challenge, nant scandal and false eee, Sen ete en rene sald, we
+ . ve ae in fact evaded it hibel ang defamatory imputations fs tributes of * very Sxclusive club.
ey Ww sue him for libel ~* ee fo ; 1
‘ ) § or Slander if he made the same ~ » ember of Congress has The members jealously guard
: charge rithout immunity. It is | Qcer them in his seat. If it we years ago the charge of homo-'
a »- [fairly clear that such a suit could |; i ‘s character | : set
i ~ OE ; ‘? ginerwise, a man sexuality was impute
: ‘ be pusiained if witnesses could |: puight be taken away without the one Senator sad the ranks er nis
sD [ Sinator MeCarthy sesested mar || possibility of rede tse either BY "fellow members quickly closed
wope - ed pri- the malice or indiscretion | round him in defense.
~ {rately ] }
1 ae * mor privilege he had overweening self-conceit of 8 But the public in this instance
“1% 1 had an experience which member of Congres’ the courts | Is entitled at the very least to
>) Fthrows some tight P Later decisions |; know the circumstances. behind
met §e1 ton ght on this. For- altered this construction. Bona | the outbreak. In particular; the
Peaneleenia Joseph Guifey of fide publication was held to be | influence of the Nationalist
floor of ama of i ged on the immune from the charge of libel’ China lobby and its paid repre-
enate that I had or slander. But, plainly, the re- sentatives should be brought to Pag
sponsibility of the legislator was
to be assumed as the following
from the decision of a Federal
court in Washington expresses it:
‘presumably legislators wilt
be restrained in the exercise of
such a privilege by the respon-
sibilities of their office. More- can fgreign policy. And in fhe
over, in the event of their fail- progéss harm has been don? to Wash.
urb in that regard, they will be the /institutions of free govern-
subject to discipline bee mee a
‘ ——
colleagues. a
ee. Saar
light. If reports of the lobby’s
role are even partly true, here is
an extraordinary instance of the A -
representatives, paid agents and Times Herald
advocates: of a foreign power ‘
creating something close
chaos in the conduct of Ameyi- Wash. Post
;for wriling a story about oil
+ | deals in Mexico involving Guffey
and John L. Lewis. I learned he
had sald the same thing to re-
porters off the floor and i
hrought suit for slander. After
a number of depositions had
been taken, Guffey officially
apologized on the Senate ffoor.
There Was no claim of immunity.
No one can question the right
of a legislator to say what he
|-Pleases with immunity from
prosecution for his remarks.
This goes back to the mosts of
parltmentary history, and <t has ’
been ‘peatediy sustained by\he 7} 5)
_ i paid by a large oii company
-
News
Star
ao j
INPEXTN - 5
ten ee
eatala aes
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic