Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Sen Joseph Joe Mccarthy — Part 12
Page 11
11 / 58
ly wa A LES cn Saree SN a ee
| ( nk ailinmeenteene tn seen ee we
r Pad ™. ; ; 7
STANDARD FORM NO, 84+ : | | |
Office Memot.ndum + onxTEp stai
TO: Mr. De M. taaa VW ; pare: May 9, 1959,f Lf. a“
ee
FROM + Ur. Es ia wineerrgf$) f;
38 GOVERNMENT
SUBJECT: LOYALTY OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES =e
Reference ts made to the attached memorandum me
from the Director to ur. Peyton Ford dated Hay Oy 1950, i.
herein Ur. Ford has made the notation: "Continue as Nannon
marked -~ I would, however, to continue to furnish th tease
other material as per our conversation until Dawson and
see Seth Ro” Uf
Fursuant to your instructions, I first contac teh Mi
Thomas, the Secretary of Mr. Ford, to determine the meaning
the above-quoted notation. She, in turn, referred me to ifr.
rord and he stated that he could see how we were possibly confu
and he stated further that he meant the, Bureau should continue
supply information to the Loyalty Review Board in the same manne
as he prevtously had indicated,\ until such tine as he, Mr. Ford, ~
talk to Mr. Dawson at the White House and with Mr, Seth sia! eae
He said, in other words, the Bureau should furnish loyaity re orts
and information pertaining to the loyalty-of present employees
of the State Department, but that if a request for a security
type report were received, such a report should not be gtven to Ure ©
Richardson at this time. If there are any changes as a result
of his conference with Mr. Dawson and Mr, Richardson, he wiii advise
the Bureaut
. Upon my departure from Mr. Ford's office, I specifically
7 stated that I understood that the Bureau should continue to operate
on the same basis with the Loyalty Review Board as was previously
agreed to by Mr. Ford and that if a request were received for a
security type report, that 1+ would not be furnished te the Loyalty
Review Board. He stated that this was correct. yf
ACTION; . _ Tees
Inasmuch ag’ tt wag, nécessary to obtain clarification
as to Mr. Ford's penned notation set forth on the Bureau 's
memorandum of May 5, 1950, it ts believed that this should be set
Jorth in writing to aE ore tiae regard tt ia suggested that
nat
this confirmation be handléd‘by the attached memorandum of
Maw O 7Ta4" winasntad + bP ee
EGY Sy ave, GiTeCved te are Peytor Ford, wheretn reference fs made
© ENCE. [Qi 23278- LS
Ber : .. RECORDED = . JUN 13 1950
© Abegennedt 1250 i PS b
ye a
a - ee et
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic