◆ SpookStack

t a ere A ee es a ne se” an eh A eo ee mm “Ne _ ; =F [ « —eee « fire Men © lune 5, MS ce Men, . - boveRNMENT ~ /992 « UNITED! c 3 ball | dead AFAVES: wife F VNILES s/f 4 » To : WR A. H, ; ) . DaTz: March 22, 44 ra . _ ma ¥opnom se OH. STANLEY/ YAY. OR SU3jECT: ee ae aus sh A . 1" - Quartermaster General 83.20 Dp ms War Departaent ier e part meet | Washington, De Ce LOYALTY OF GOVERLENT EMPLOYEES 5 v = PURPOSE: fo record telephonic conversations held this mo: ay >: IDA regarding the above-captioned case. Fi BACKGROUND: Late yesterday afternoon, as Correlation and Liaieon Section concerning the above-captioned case to the Army's letter of Jamuary 5, 1918, requesting an inves on of was being considered for exployment by the drag. GRRBtaee the Borea: had ever replied to this i letter. U 7 ac tensed on Jamary 12, 1918, at which time the Army was advised that a 2 investigation had been oe completion the results furnished through channela. 1% any further reply had ever been made, acknowledgment and wanted to knoe pointed ont to mr that the reporte of a full field co were sent to the CL ocxxission in accord ance with Brrr procedures under the Loyalty Progran on April 19, 1948. z Ry x further pointed out that our files show that individual copies of the 1 ; the Aray through liaison channels on April 20, 19L9. this was true and he was in possession of these repo . inquiry a. abe od aed thansaftae he mabed iy concerning the general evaluati 2h Wu Fegera BK Wises wr be seacu ef informants by the Bureao in Loyalty cases. Gnstance confidential informants are evaluated as reliability in loyalty reports, and suggested if he wanted to talk to somone fariliar with the loyalty Program to discuss the matter th a of the loyalty Bection.[ / INE ener pts pointed out t in knowing whe 0) aute ty investigation proved or disproved the - original allegations agains GED Sc0rce: him that we had conducted [> the investigation at the Aray*F request and that we bad forwarded the reparte reflect-. ing the regul{s of that investigation to the ‘appropriate suthorities and that the ~~ question as t@ whether the’ allegations or disproven was &@ question for the Board adjydicatihg the matter ‘to decide, then asked whether, in those ha aa of known reliability, the ingi oy. where an Saforpant fe evaluated by th <THtay a te 4f mich, informants could be taken dag) gig on Saf soe W a} when the Bureau evaluated an inf ¢ as ‘of known reli i a sc haste ‘Of our past experience with ta Intpratn yd gt oy Dado Fosse t 1 fofd F ws e 4 ft ANS ‘i hi gs : E: ¥ 8) E | OIMUNA. fo/e Pc ' — ” o E y7 é