Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Sen Joseph Joe Mccarthy — Part 2
Page 49
49 / 85
New York Office of the Qffice of Information and Educational Exchange but
does not give any details on these six cases upon which an identification
could be based. In cases No. 19 and No. 36 Senator McCarthy's remarks were so
sketchy that insufficient facts were available to mako an identification.
Thus, possible idontifications were made in a total of 69 of the.
cases referred to by the Senator. Of this figure, however, cases No. 9 and
77 apparently refer to the same individual
and have been
so treated in the attached summary. Cases No. 48 and 49 are umned together
by the Senator as involving a man and wife
and
and, therefore, these two cases have been treated together in
memorandun.
Taking the above into consideration, you will note that there are
Jonly a total of 68 individuals involved that we have been able to identify
and, since the cases involving the man and wife have been treated in one.
memorandum, the attached sunmary contains a total of only 67 individual case
memoranda.
Of the 68 individuals involved, 37 are possibly still employed in the
of course, have made no effort to check with State to see if all these
individuals are actually still employed.
With regard to the 68 individuals involved, we have conducted 38 full.
fsuotgelgaseaut Aqnefot edAg Lrgnbu! Areungnoad g 'suongengqsaaug Atesot pret]
and 5 investigations under the Voice of America program, or a total of 48
irvestigations conducted either under the President's Executive Order No. 9835 or
9 geuonnaape ue uI (geasoad ennenry go angoa) 'seeaauog aos eot met onnand
cases we have conducted some type of applicant or security investigation in the
past. Of these six, according to our files, five apparently are no longer
employed in the State Department. In the.case of 14 individuals we cannot
identify them as having been subjects of imvestigation by the Bureau, but, of
ong Aq panondue naduot ou Annuanedde one ot onennpug segdr ano daoqunu saae
oo ogqean ueeq daay on *penordue oq you Aen Jo Aeu mog pue guenaedeg daens
determine whether we have received loyalty forms on these four individuals
Jo yoet oun Jo meta uy pus pexenut uenq lou oagy senoy nagenot nre esneoaq
identifying data. We are arranging through Liaison for a discreet check on
these four individuals to determine if they are actually employed. If so,
appropriate action will be taken..
It is noted that Senator McCarthy, in his remarks before th. Senate,.
singled out for particular attention Case No. 1.
see Page
- see Page three); and Case No. 8l .
one); Case No. 2 .
- see Rage I2). Iour attention is also invited to Cases No. 9
- see Page 23) who was referred to by Senator.
and 77
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic