Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Sempra Energy — Part 1
Page 14
14 / 42
| ©
UNCLASSIFIED
To: San Diego From: San Diego
Re: SD 205-0, 02/17/2011
asking that th ouncil overridel ___|veto of Resolution
No. CO-42-10. claimed that neither Sempra nor IPP solicited ,...
aay vote from any council delegate and that the council demanded
provide proof af accusation at the recerded 11/10/2010
meeting (Tab A-4 was unable to provide any proof. The
NNERO notified im a memorandum dated 11/20/2010, that they
not initiate an investigation of the allegation because
could not provide substantive information relative to the
person's name and whether the person was a NN elected >
employee (Tab A-5). On 11/22/2010, the NNERO also notified
in a memorandum that they would not investigate his allegation
without both the subject and personal matter jurisdiction (Tab A-
6).
In a faxed letter dated 12/17/201
consultant and former advise at he had
spoken to several members of the NN ment and some council
delegates to learn that no one eriouSly when he made
ee NE bribery allegation. informed that during
NNERO interview” uated he was approached by a man
he had never seen befor could not identify by name when
offered a campaign donation to vote green. [_]stated that the
NN was not planning to file any charges against Sempra (Tab A-7).
On 12/18/2010,
(Tab A-8, document retaine
NNERO formally notified Sempra
that they had interviewed
a signed declaration
On 12/22/2010, the
a letter addressed to
and without further
ation (Tab A-9). In conclusion, sent a letter to
12/30/2010, stating surprised to learn
allegation, asked wh did not report the alleged
it supposedly occurréd@d in September, and requested
send details of the allegation to Sempra in writing.
advised that Sempra rea nixed Jos] _]
in Arizona to conduct an independ
zton which was_still ongoing. The DOJ requested that
inguire wit as to why the investigation had not
een closed based u tcome of the NNERO probe.
and
The second matter presented addressed concerns
surrounding transactions associated with a fire station. given by
Sempra as a charitable donation to the City of Tijuana.
UNCLASSIFIED
3
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic