◆ SpookStack

section o QO O UNCLASSIFIED To: San Diego From: San Diego Re: SD 205-0, 02/10/2011 sentation provided by as_documented in the enclosed FD- Following the: interview,[ __lwas asked to provide documentation from the Ensenada AG's office that the 100,000 BESS bond is still pending. /2011, Writer received two_e-mai from forwarded two emails front | One email related to the construction of a fire station in Tijuana paid for by Sempra and donated to Tijuana. The payment of these expenses circumvented the traditional approval process. ee £ minister. These p approval process. liso circumvented the traditional also stated in his email that he had annel 10 news regarding our meeting with emails and attachments are maintained in the e zero file. edia articles published on 02/06/2011 regarding meeting with government investigators are maintained in the 1A section of the zero file. Writer located a web link in the comments = ‘to a document from Navajo Natio to the Speaker of the Navajo Nation Council. @ Llettér iS dated 11/08/2010 and its purpose is to veto Resolution No. CO-42-10, which granted Sempra and a piping company (non-Navajo entities) exclusive rights to a wind project on the reservation. Certain Navajo laws were. disregarded: in approving the resolution; furthermore, the letter states that reports. were received that Sempra and the piping company representatives offered certain elected officials cash for their v of the resolution. In addition, Council Delegate stated on the floor of the Navajo Nation Council that on 09 23/2010 he was offered "campaign funds" by Sempra to "vote greén." A Gopy of this letter is maintained---- in the 1A section of the zero file. Based upon the foregoing information and that criminal prosecution in this matter as it relates. to the FCPA allegation against Sempra. However, given this and Similar allegations of misconduct concerning Sempra's business operations, Sempra was ‘requested to undertake the following docum the. enclosed FD-302s, Ausal____] and DOJ Deputy. Chief concluded that insufficient evidence o theft] other actions during a telephone call with[ on 02/10/2011: UNCLASSIFIED 5 bs b7C