Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Robert F Kennedy Assassination — Part 3
Page 12
12 / 20
~~
”
with the exception of the ballistics documentation, these files -——
reflect an outstanding job of team effort and research. In recent
years, many people have advocated in court petitions and requests
that these ten volume summaries be released for public inspection.
Special Counsel Kranz recommends that, upon editing of the
particular files of personal histories and private sensitive matter,
that might be embarassing to witnesses, potential suspects, and
subjects (whose cooperation was essential to the police and
investigative agencies) that the ten volume summary be released to
the general public.
The events in recent years, particularly the Congressionai
investigations into government secrecy and deception, make it
imperative that public agencies and institutions retain. the
confidence and trust of the public. The refusal of fputilic
agencies, and in this instance the Los Angeles Police Department,
to open investigative files on a matter that has been officially
Closed undermines faith in law enforcement.
Unlike the L.A.P.D., the Los Angeles District Attorney's
Office has consistently held its files and reports on the Sirhan
matter open to the public at all times. During the special inves-
tigation conducted by Special Counsel Kranz, numerous critics,
including Ted Charach, Tom Thomson, editor of the L.A. Vanguard,
and columnist Jim Horowitz, often looked at the District Attorney's
files, reports, and interview sheets from the investigation
conducted over the past eight years. The policy of openness Q)
reflected by the District Attorney's Office should be emmulated by
the L.A.P.D., and the ten volume summary should be released to the
general public. The argument that such records of a police inves-
tigation are exempted from forced disclosure under the state Public
Records Act is moot since there is no longer an on-going investi-
gation in the matter.
As the Los Angeles Times has editorialized, perhaps represen-
tatives of the County Bar Association could review and excise the
ten volume summary, and delete personal histories, and sensitive
matters that might be embarrassing to the several witnesses and
people interviewed. In light of the unexplained destruction of
ceiling panels and x-ray analysis, and in light of the lack of
thorough documentation in the ballistics report, and the de-
struction of the controversial second gun used to conduct muzzle
distance and sound tests by DeWayne Wolfer, and the continuing
doubts expressed by conspiracy buffs or the misinformed, the
failure to release the ten volume summary will only contribute to
doubt and suspicion. More importantly, public faith and confidence
in law enforcement and public institutions is an essential element
for the survival of any society. It is, of course, a legitimate
purpose for investigative agencies to retain secret files on
‘potential suspects in areas regarding terrorism, sabotage, threats
to lives and property, and assault and potential violence against
| - 52 - ; | QO!
14
ve
‘
Me dg caps Me
ROG 2 oe Dag LORS May ta
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau's information
Related subtopics