Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Robert F Kennedy Assassination — Part 2
Page 12
12 / 60
92s/ '92.!
§eaction of
Critics
Following Joint*§eport*Issued
by Panel
Experts
f October,
1973 .
The issuance
of the
comprehensive Joint
report filed
by the
seven ballistics
experts received
nationwide publicity
that there
was no
evidence of
a second
gun being
fired
in the
pantry. At
that
time, most
of the
parties involved,
and their
respective counsel,
seemed satisfied
that the
issue had
been concluded.
However, upon
lengthy studies
of the
working papers
of
the
ballistics
experts,
some of
the original
advocates of
the two-gun
theory
began
to
express
their
doubts
in
public.
Dr. Robert
Jolling, the
president
of the
American Academy
of Forensic
Sciences, held
a press
con-
ference with
Paul Schrade,
Allard Lowenstein,
Attorney Mel
Levine,
and other
critics,
and stated
that the
media had
jumped the
gun in
emphasizing
that
there
had
been no
second gun.
To Jolling,
Lowenstein and
Schrade, in
particular, they
felt the
ballistics
panel had
not concluded
that only
one gun,
and no
other gun
was
fired
in the
pantry. Jolling,
satisfied
that
the
cannelure
question had
been finally
answered, asked
that further
research
be
done concerning
the issue
of rifling
angles of
the gun
barrel.
Jolling was
particularly critical
of L.A.P.D.
criminalist Dewayne
Wolfer, and
felt that
Wolfer had
committed mistakes
during his
1968
analysis and
examination. Specifically,
at the
September hearing,
Wolfer had
identified
a photomicrograph
taken
on
June
6, 1968,
as
consisting of
two separate
negatives representing
the Kennedy
bullet Exhibit
HT
and
a test
bullet. These
negatives were,
in fact,
as verified
by the
seven experts,
the Kennedy
bullet, Exhibit
H7,
and the
Goldstein bullet,
Exhibit 52.
Additionally, Jolling
recom-
mended that
additional tests
be
conducted
in an
area beyond
traditional ballistics
and firearms
examination. Jolling
felt that
no definite
conclusions had
been reached,
and there
was still
a
need fcr:
photo-grametric reconstruction
of the
scene;
a determination
of the
minimum and
maximum number
of
bullets fired
within the
pantry;
R.
a test
firing into
comparable ceiling
panels suspended
below like
concrete material
similiar to
that found
at the
Ambassador Hotel
so as
to scientifically
determine the
ricochet
potential of
.22 caliber
hollow-point, copper
coated, mini-mag
ammunition. '
- 68
_
a re-examination
of the
bullet pathways;
e
O
O
O
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau's information
Related subtopics