Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Robert F Kennedy Assassination — Part 1
Page 49
49 / 59
-'1:-H-~ s.-I;-~
-» - _:¢- if
__
K,» D
A further
test advocated
by Bradford
dealt with
powder residue
composition analysis
by
gas
chromatography.
This ballistics
examination would
utilize a
new methodology
recently developed
by
the Aerospace
Corporation of
El Segundo.
Bradford felt
this method
would demonstrate
the differences
in composition
of a
single
burned
particle of
ammunition powder.
Specifically, if
particles of
powder could
be removed
from
the
Robert Kennedy
coat, from
the
autopsy specimens
and from
fired cartridge
cases from
the Sirhan
gun, the
method of
analysis could
then
determine
whether all
three
powder residue
sources were
consistent with
each other
and
whether
or not
there
was
any significant
differences which
would indicate
the presence
of
a second
gun. _
In his
final
request
for the
test firing
of the
Sirhan weapon,
at the
conclusion of
his declaration,
Bradford admitted,
"That it
is a
wellknown fact
among firearms
examiners, and
a fact
of my
own
experience, that
a S1811
percentage of
.22 caliber
guns have
the
capability of
producing successively
fired test
bullets that
identify with
each
other
on a
basis
of
microscopic characteristics
of individuality.
Failure of
test
bullets
to identify
with
evidence bullets
is so
prevalent with
.22 caliber
guns
that
microscopic identification
are expected
in
less
than
20% of
the
cases examined."
Bradford was
merely stating
obvious facts
that
would be
readily revealed
when the
seven ballistics
experts
conducted
their
own
independent examination
and testing
in
September and
October of
1975.
Hearings before
Judge Wenke,
August
1975
The re-testing
of the
Sirhan weapon,
and the
re-examination of
all bullet
evidence, were
ordered
by
Presiding Judge
Wenke
in
September. 1975.
Although the
court order
was
related
to the
petitions of
Paul Schrade,
and CBS,
several parties
and counsel
were before
the court
in this
unique proceeding.
Additionally, Judge
Wenke instructed
all counsel
to formulate
an examination
and test
procedure, and
submit such
test for
the
court's approval.
Judge
Wenke
was, in
effect, requesting
counsel
to negotiate
the ground
rules and
parameters for
the forthcoming
ballistics examination.
,
-1.15...
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau's information
Related subtopics