Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Robert F Kennedy Assassination — Part 1
Page 35
35 / 59
1974 Hearings Conducted by Supervisor Baxter Ward
One of the most persistent critics of the manner in which
ballistics evidence was presented at the trial. of Sirhan was Los
Angeles newsman Baxter Ward. In 1971, Ward often devoted a
sizeable portion of his program on KHJ television to highlighting
apparent discrepancies in trial testimony of various eyewitnesses,
‘ giving sizeable coverage to trial critics such as Theodore Charach
and others critical of criminalist DeWayne Wolfer. In 1972, Ward
was elected to the County Board of Supervisors and in 1974
commenced his own hearirg: to investigate ballistics evidence by
virtue of his chairmansui:p of the Coroner's Department of Los
Angeles County.
Prior to the May 1974 hearing, Ward asked his fellow
supervisors for subpoena power to compel District Attorney Joseph
Busch and L.A.P.D. criminalist Wolfer to appear before his hearing.
Prior to the jhearing date in May, a series of Board of
Supervisors meetirss “uiiéers.) revealed a growing feud between Ward
and Busch. Ward statec”™Kos quarrel with Busch was based on the
belief -that the District Attorney should "remove the cloud
presently hanging over law enforcement in the Kennedy case by
initiating a total review of the ballistics evidence, including
refiring of the gun used by Sirhan." Additionally, Ward stated to
Busch, "I remind him that I made this same basic proposal back in
1971 when the -bullet controversy first developed. In fact, it was
my persistence in this matter in a three month broadcast series in
1971 tnat led to the total estrangement between Mr. Busch and me."
Ward insisted that his hearing was to deal with doubts
raised by certain criminoligists that bullets used as evidence in
the Sirhan murder trial did not match up.
Busch, who descrifec the proposed hearing into the bullet
dispute as "ridiculous", stated that he would not appear at the
hearing and cited government code sections in the Los Angeles
County Charter challenging the authority of a Supervisor to conduct
legislative hearings- into essentially a criminal case.
Additionally, he felt that Supervisor Ward was using the issue of
the Sirhan case as publicity to capture publie notoriety during his
campaign for the Democratic nomination for Governor that spring.
Mac Donell Affidavit
In addition to the original affidavit of William Harper of
December, 1970, Ward's hearings were to highlight the affidavit and
personal testimony of criminalist Herbert Mac Donell, director of
the Laboratory of Forensic Science in Corning, New York. Mac
Donell had examined the same 1970 photograph taken by Harper of the
bullets removed from Senator Kennedy's neck and victim Weisel. Ted
Charach had delivered these photographs to Mac Donell in 1973.
Essentially Mae Donell made two conclusions.
~31-
wp Ee ae a a
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau's information
Related subtopics