Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Robert F Kennedy Assassination — Part 1
Page 32
32 / 59
The paths of these three bullets, which entered Senator
Kennedy's body are consistent with the Sirhan testimony of eye-
witnesses. Dr. Noguchi's trial testimony revealed gunshot wound #1
to have a path angle of 10 to 15 degrees upward, gunshot wound #2 to
have a path angle of 35 degrees upward, and gunshot wound #3 to have
a path angle of 30 degrees upward. Dr. Noguchi concluded in his
examination that Senator Kennedy's arm was raised 90° when gunshot
eri na #9 wae AFP Ti At 2A anA frhat t¢ha Ganatantiia arm une mavindg ha.
wound ¥a wag inf AAW, qgilw Via VHS wULIidakwWws vw Gil AOD Ww 21s wa
tween shots #2 and #3. On page 4531 and 4532 of the trial trans-
eript, Dr. Noguchi testified as follows: "My opinion, although
sthere were different cirections of the gunshot wounds, but the
“overall patvern of the-auirection of the three gunshot wounds, gun-
shot wound #1, #2 and #3 were in a position right to left, an upward
Sireetion, and this pattern is consistent with the wounds inflicted
OB wnidoting in the rapid succession... and also these wounds alone
“were not the factor in determining it. I think an examination of
the clothing onght ta be. also taken into consideration."
owWHE OANVLiliil wo ME Sse seu? SOPs Leel ii
aw By . "the
oo rae, Mae!
od ; we gt
tk
Spat ne
1971 Grand Jury Investigation
In August 1971 the Los Angeles County Grand Jury commenced a
formal hearing relative to internal procedures and security control
in connection with the Grand Jury and trial exhibits received in
evidence in the Sirhan case. In this five day hearing, thirty
witnesses were examined under oath, and all witnesses detailed
‘o¥the security breakdown occasioned when a Superior Court judicial
order establishing pre and post trial exhibit security was ignored
or not implemented by the staff of the County Clerk's Office. The
apparent violations of previously issued court orders by Superior
Court Judges Arthur Alarcon (1968), and Herbert Walker (1969) re-
stricting access to court exhibits to either counsel of record or
by court order, prompted a Los Angeles County Inquiry based on
findings of the Grand Jury investigation.
Chief Administrative Officer, County of Los Angeles
Report Regarding the vepartment of the County Cierx;
Analysis of Grand vary rinadings
Reiative to the Sirnan Case
In the fall of 1971, the Chief Administrative Officer of the
County of Los Angeles initiated a comprehensive investigation of
the operation of the office of the County Clerk. This particular
action was in response to a report to the Board of Supervisors by
the Grand Jury which contained various charges of mismanagement by
the County Clerk in the handling of the exhibits in the Sirhan
trial. |.
Arthur G. Will, Chief Administrative Officer of the County,
directed the investigation into three major areas:
- 28 -
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau's information
Related subtopics