◆ SpookStack

awe r hoe, 4 “ Brkt (Rinston-direct; ae Hm se ame man nm fem fae MY lcO-t17:: (TR 9/20/4: EAD lis then make? 2I°°TOS whether he forculated and issued , & oall in connection with tre 1657 Convention, 414-7 3 anavers4 in tne (effirmative, (1H 14,744) FC GONTY objects. Susteined. | Oo ’ BATHIR saked WISCTOR wren the Convention was held, (TR 14,744) ED CHT objects. The Court stated, “ell, be just sald 4t was in kay, 1657." oe SACEE x then aried SIHGICY wheticr he recalled the exact date of thet Convention. (TX 14, 76£) BE CCH*Y ebfects. The Court poate out thet he hei duct TREN RROM AtKOG FIRETN fin what eapacit; he ettenied = ~~ the Convention. : = (Th 14,765) Me Kid objecte. Overruled. DS 7 44. i arnaewere’, Wor dele ete," SAT dS ben escd ttet to 2S Ts defense exrdidit Ryo fee ddentificetion w.iic:. wae tue wecluration os crinsiplee and gy-laws ef tie Young Cormuniet Learue of the USA and asked Lin what, Sf anything, be di¢ in connectinn with the writiny of the Declaration of Frinciples. r (TE 14,448) KC G°HIY otfecta. xO GTErY refore the Court te yecet eras, . @1 ent €2 of the record pointing eut that ‘mrtant defense exnibit ax? .. was first offered wien Defendant CRLFS was on the stand et wileh tive this exrikit was excluded. Court sustains the of icotion, BACHIX, with the Court's perrizaion, stated that the purpose of his present action was to develo, the personal position of : Vistsa insceuch es the evidence was aised to show that io pereonelly wrote tne lece- leration of Principles as besrinr ugon his Gndividual intent. SACUFR | said the Declaration waa ultizately adopted ky the Convention and that | de whet the Verense proposed to trove, The Court etated treat it hed ree exenined tre exhibit and wes adhering to ite ruling, SACHE then asked 7». the Court whetner thie rulin-: should .e deemed to have made unnecessary oo a epecific offer. The Court enaered in the affirrative stating that if the quertion were answered affirseatively snd tie exhibit were offered §t would havea excluded it on the objection by Mo CONTY, GACHFS then stated, “sell, tuat sexs it up wetts tichtly.” The court oleerve! tnet it thoursht SACul» deeired $5 .evo nig position sede clear on the recor: eee anf vAL ik greed tuat this wee true {ie l4, 74d; Trial edjoursed te ¢,terber il, Lkss. 3d