◆ SpookStack

i a bit WG {cinston = Lirect) BY 100601752. (tin 9/20/45) (TR, 1,71) Mo “CHFY Anterroste te request thet the Court bs told wren, where, who ws there ané so on in sonnection with any testimony oonceraiog . achoolse S/CETN eaid he inverted to pres throuch the @ubjeet of the seliccl | wry quickly are! ! prosced to another subfect and didn't wint te delay tie . proceeéines. Be: ikY said thet the latter wes the point he we tryin to wmxce and if subjects were to be brouzh, in he wentes to Enor sonething abhowt who teurt then and all the oth-r thincs aceessary to ley @ proper founiation and wae objecting to further deseription of the echeol until thawzwe eonditiens warm mot, Thea Gourl gustedned the ahiesti ah onc Be} *SCHCY Biv Fe Swit A VAS ee ee we af ke ee a ew ay escec thot RIRITLN'S wtetenent that he had studied polition2 econcny and history of the labor aevenmt be stricken, The Court said it wes letting thet portion rennin tui wes nct perrittin: details eonsernine the tesching in the echool without the arvel requiresmis of Prost of whens where and whe aid the wecchinge yer asked KINSTON whether: he hed obtained eleyent ‘tn New Terk | Cc. ty efter completing the courses he Ad tekens% the school end the Iounc Cormurist ecrve, INT N aneworwd in the affimetive sintin: he had worked in the Circuletion Department ef the "Lounge Corker", as well as doing @ little writing ani helping _ te bull a route for the ®ieily worker", Tie "ioun” orcs, be acd, wes the officiel OrcEr. of the Youn; Communist leapue, Sicin.-N asked hin whether ha hed @bout tris tine bocor 8 mceber of “~y y orcent sation wicae mecbbaranip: consisted ae 4-4 se --.4 2-H a 14,703) cbjection, Overrclods | KITON ansxered thet he h:d becore a nanbder ef the tnanplosed Coures. wich he had eririmlly jeined in 1931 while in Fonscs City. SJCHER agked tho witness — whether he could relete the activities engared in b; hin ee a wwver of the ‘Unsaplojyed Council of Hew York City. — - (72. 14,703) ReKTY obfected. éverruled, ¥lth the Court! wre 24 Be wwe i wee ken y pointed. out thet the question weg wit activities hed the witness been encared in as a mmber of the Unemployed Council, The Court acid thet it ws tryin: to be as Liberal as it reasonebly eould with the witnesses who were testifying en thet wien it noted a dt sposition to ro inte — _ Weeponsive answers end long apecches, it felt compelled to do sone restrictin. +. The Court soted thet the present witness hed not 2@ yet ahown any disposition Sony. .* @f doing this and since the matter in hend wis a natter for the Court's, discrvtion and ene of the thincs thet the jucces are supposed to be particuicri qualified to hencle, it wes going te go slonz in the prevent inst:nee as lon: a9 possible ent en thet theory weg allowing the question. MeH IY seid his point ws th t the present testimony ves nen beck in 1933 end his objuction ws nel on the bro.dness of the cuestion but beesuze he did net beliewe it was relevant. The Court repliad thst the prolinine ry wetericl ha? e besring on the ¢2se becouse of tie dhient tht is invelved anid for tht reason were * oe .