Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Paul Robeson Sr — Part 23
Page 43
43 / 100
bat nl 1
i
i oe 4: gud
CAR: Kid {Robeson = Direst}
WY 100-81752 (TR. 9/20/49)
Om 14,669) MeQOHET r ob jnetad. _Bustetned. Ce ene ee
_ OBES stated thet be hes known WILLIANSON f or "some years", CROCKETT |
askeé if he had ever beard WH US.N speak as 2 reprecentacive of the cr te
ROBESON stated he bas known DENNIS for “some years*. GROCKETT asked if he
hed ever visited with DENNIS. RCBESCH said *yes*, _
(TR. 14,661) McSOKEY objected. Sustained and ansver stricken.
CROCEE?T asked if he beZ ever shared the pls tfors with DEXFTS at,
; 7 pablo asthering. i rs
nv , ~
SAF ee
“‘.
(TR. 14,661) MoOCHBY objected. Qustaimd, 9° A
CROCKETT asked if be had ewer shared the platform with any of the defendants
at eny public gathering.
(TR. 14 662) McOOPRLY objected. Sustained.
ChOCKETT asked “J think ro abared the ‘Platfors with urs, . ROOSEVELT, have
Tn notre = . |
Hs (the 14,661) MeO? objected. “guataioed. a ae = : ~ _ 7 F
rs a a The Court stated that st was getting the inpression tint there ovestions
which CROCKETT met know come within the rulinc of exclusion were being asked
for the purpose of getting s oleim as to the facts before the jury in a way that
it bad noticed done by other lawyers in this oase. It hed indicated its
Cieplearure at such things end hoped CKOCKATT would bear thet in wind. fhe
Court said that the series of cvesticns CROCKETT hed asked wes bound to convey
the fupresaton thet the facts atated in the questions are trae, despite the fact
rulings that if asked and objected to it would eustsin the objections and rvle
ten Outs Tee Court eie not think thet a Lawyer shoule do ate on,
CR CKETY eteted that it was his anderstanding of the Courts roling that”
he mst fix the tine, the Place and the circumstances so thet be eould get inte
whet was discussed. ae
The Court seta CHCKiTT must nor that @ eucetion as to whether thie witness
wee on the pletfora with the tife of forter Presicent ROCSLVseLT hee nothing te do
with this cese. The Court honed thet CHOE:TT would feel thet it woult be better
ua : le eo
that it had ruled thex out and despite the fact that it was obvious from ite © =.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
federal bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic