Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
New Alliance Party — Part 1
Page 55
55 / 65
:
Py
many injuries and some persons required
hospitalization.
“Operation Mop-up” was front-page news in”
virtually every Amerigan progressive newspaper
during 1973, and it is difficult to believe it was not
_known to Newman and his followers when they
first contacted NCLC a few weeks after Operation
Mop-Up was declared a success by LaRouche.
Furthermore, physical assaults by NCLC mem-
bers against critics were reported regularly well
into 1976, and periodic assaults by LaRouche
fundraisers still occur. In 1974, many former
NCLC members report, they were still requiredto
take paramilitary training classes led by fellow
members.
The trigger for Operation Mop Up was a
“March, 1973 warning by NCLC to the Communist
Party, USA. to stop opposing the creation by La-
Rouche of an alternative to the Black-led Nation-
al Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO) which
LaRouche denounced as being part of a “union-
busting slave-labor” alliance. LaRouche set up an
alternative, the National Unemployed and Wel-
fare Rights Organization (NUWRO), and, ac-
cording to LaRouche, NCLC then sent
delegations into public Communist Party meet-
ings, “demanding that this criminal behavior ofthe
CP leadership” — that is, support for the original
NWRO—“be openly discussed and voted down
by the body assembled.”
Eyewitnesses recall this “discussion” usually
consisted of primarily-white and young NCLC
members standing up and disrupting meetings of
the primarily-Black and older NWRO with calls
for a debate on LaRouche’s charges against
NWRO leaders until members of the audience
were forced to physically drag the NCLC mem-
bers out of the meeting. These confrontations be-
came formalized under Operatioa Mop-Up.
supporting the-ptiginal Black-led NWRO, they
too were attacked by the predominantly white
NCLC supporters. While the Operation Mop-Up
attacks were officially ended in late 1973 or early
et
boat te ‘" te yao
United Autoworkers and other industrial unions.
Reports of these assaults continued through 1976,
and NCLC members have continued until recent-
6 - Political Research Associates
}
ly to assist in assaults on members of Teamsters
for a Democratic Union and another rank-and-
-file-Feamster-reform group, PROD..
In 1974, according to former NCLC members,
LaRouche first began to seek contact with ex-
tremist and anti-Semitic right-wing groups and in-
dividuals around the idea of tactical unity in
opposing imperialism and the ruling class in
general, and the Rockefellers in particular.
LaRouche’s obsession with conspiracy theories
blossomed in 1974, and during this period he
- began expounding a view linking certain Jewish in-
stitutions to a plot to destroy Western civilization
and usher in a “New Dark Age”.
This is the character of the NCLC that at-
tracted Newman and his followers in early 1974.
In his 1974 book Power and Authority, Newman
wrote that his followers would “organize in the
spirit outlined” by LaRouche. The question is not
how long the Newmanites worked under the
political leadership of Lyndon LaRouche, but
how they can explain what attracted Newman and
his followers to LaRouche in the first place. To
this day NAP leadership has refused to renounce
or to deal candidly or accurately with the fact that
the Newmanites at one time joined an organiza-
tion which was at best a collection of paranoid
sexist homophobic thugs and at worst a nasceni
Using the FBI to Harass Dissidents
It was during the period:shat the Newmanites
were involved with NCLC that NCLC began to
collect and disseminate intelligence on progres-
sive groups. It is well documented that NCLC
went on to provide intelligence to domestic and
foreign government agencies. While documents
released under the Freedom of Information Act
reveal that U.S. government agencies frequently
dismissed the material provided by the NCLC, it
" was provided nonetheless. As early as February,
1974, NCLC representatives met with an official
in the U.S. Department of Commerce to “provide
_ substantial evidence which would exonerate
dum released under the Freedom of Information
Act.
ae Preside: tiNiaoe from Mee ee
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic