Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Mary Jo Kopechne Chappaquiddick — Part 2
Page 20
20 / 44
ee et NE meh ates ai A matt ae 8 ya Se
ok ste
Senator Stennis (@ Page 2 ser ont comsanern CONFIDENTIAL
Also from the standpoint of time, I felt obliged to read two
books on the subject that came to my attention late ¥ast fall and
winter.g They are mentioned in my book. Additionally, this has
necessarily been a spare-time project.
o much for accounting for interim time and transpirations.
As you will see, the enclosed manuscript is the first section of
my book, All Honorable Men (and Women). Although exrerpts from
the testimonies of a number of others are included, it deals prin-
.cipally with the Senator's testimony. It constitutes about twenty-
five percent of the total, which is about three-quarters or a little
more finished as of this writing. I believe this is the portion
your Committee would be most concerned with, and/or concerned with
first. Certainly, it more than satisfies Mr. Fern's request for .
"underlying evidence" of my allegations of perjury. Where seven
outright perjuries are cited and detailed in the manescript, three
additional ones were perceived as my work progressed in sections
Gealing primarily with the testimonies of others closely associated
-with him and these additional perjuries are cited therein.
=
ee
I reinforce the recommendation made early in the book that
Mr. Kennedy's testimony be read straight through in srder to gain
the best overall view and comprehension of the evcnt as a whole
. then go back and look up the perjuries and quasi-perjuries as they
are roforcnced. netailins of the perjuries begins om page 20, the
quasi-perjuries (anomalies) on page 25. "Skim" reading would be a
serious mistake.
_You and/or your colleagues may find yourselves wondering
about the authenticity of my source. I received my eopy of The
Inquest from the Clerk of Courts in Edgartown, having been re-
ferred to her (Mrs. Campos) by Judge Boyle in his handwritten re-
ply to my inguiry to him about obtaining testimonial transcript.
Photocopies of that correspondence are ‘also encloseé,
At the time I had the title page photocopied, I had antici-
pated copyrighting each section as it was finished. Then I learned --
that a restricted and limited circulation nf a manuscript prior to
publication does not jeopardize copyrightability, thet copyrighting
a work of this sort implies that-it has been made public. I did
not proceed with the copyright application and none of the manu-;
script has (yet) been made public.
9 te ew cemntsin”. >
«
Now there are several other things you should know, Mr.
Stennis, the importance of which can hardly be overemphasized. At
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic