◆ SpookStack

a + oe Y fees 4 ° ~attorney (who was interviewed extensively by defendant, Frank) Robert Eili,-: 3h. That tha false allegations in said article: "that Plaintiff comaitied s holdup in London, Sngland, and that George C. Wallace would pardon Plaintatt, pps 17 & 23 “respectively, were mpplied to defendant McMiLlian by defendant Huie as evidenced by statenenta nade directly to Pisintizz by the above mentioned Percy Forexran (quoating ule to Plaintiff) elong with oral & written declarations by Defendat, Hule. See, eb eee 35. That defendant Bute in his ongoing media cempaien againat Plaintiff Libeled Plaintiff in a CBS-TV interview hosted by, Dan Rather, on or about January 2, 1976, by faleely alleging in effect that Flaintifr® bad *. murdered MLK Jr. and, robbed a loan cospany in Londen, England. 36. That the false allegations in reference ta Adolph Hitler (p. 23 saia article) was supplied to defendant Meiillian by Defendant, Fras:, a3 eT ddenced by statements mada directly to plaintiff by Flaintitfte forner af the Chattanooga Tennessee bare 72. That defendant Bule has a history, for commercial reasons, of contentiousness with «aid, Gov. Wallace, » 38. Teat defendant Frank has a history of defending Zionias even rhen ‘at includes surder, og, 46 Frank's novel, publisher in 1963, titled "THE DEED", and if allegations is count 2-f above are substantiated in court proceeding Mr. Frank's intrusion into said cr, indictment as a Goverunent advocate is readily explicable. 39. Thet an article in the BILALIAN NEWS publiched March 12, 1976, page 15, is penultinate paragraph, reported MEX Jr. wae abifting bis political alli~ ° ancee.."Dr. King wae abi fting his political allinaces and civil rights ° ‘approach. To support this view observers point to Dr. King’s views on the Viet Ham war and his roving support of the labor sovesent. Dr. King was also coming under the influence of the Teaching of the Honorable an_ a ST eh 2th. ‘ * FSEUGE G2 jan Hupaiaadse oo . 40. That Plaintiff filed a libel suit in the United States Die. Ct. for the W.D. of Tennesgee titled, Ray ¥. Frank, Civil Action 30. C-73~126, against herein defendant, Prank, in 1973, and had process served uroa Min through Aia publisher, Doubleday company. “Mr. Frank vas subsequently ~ -189-+4