Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
255_413270_UFO's_and_Defense_What_Should_we_Prepare_For
Page 36
36 / 94
maneuvers when the disks are detected lead one to assume that they are piloted or
operated by remote control.
5. Most witnesses describe objects with a metal surface that are circular or elliptical
in shape, the upper portion of which is dome shaped, flying without making any
noise in a formation of three to nine objects...
7.6.2 GEPAN/SEPRA’s Work
We do not have irrefutable tangible proof in the form of material, either whole or in
fragments, that confirm the physical nature of UAP Ds and their artifact character.
Nevertheless, the collection and expert appraisal work carried out at GEPAN/SEPRA for
over 20 years confirms the statements General Twining made in 1947.
7.6.3 French Aeronautical Cases
The study of French military aeronautical UAP D [sightings] (Orange in 1951, Tours in
1976, Luxeuil in 1977) supports General Twining’s conclusions, namely the fourth one.
The testimonies of the pilots do in fact lead one to assume that the objects were “either
piloted or operated by remote control”: all of the pilots reported that it was “the object”
that appeared to be moving toward them and not the other way around. Moreover, all of
them considered the maneuvering abilities of the object to be far superior to those that
they were familiar with.
7.6.4 Cases of Close-Up UAP D Sightings in France
For their part, the cases of close-up UAP D sightings in France are very much in
keeping with Twining’s conclusions 4 and 5. In Trans-en-Provence (Chapter 4), the
expert appraisals made at the site support the local testimony and show that the object
with a metallic appearance and circular shape landed, then took off silently within a very
short space of time not very far from a wall 2.5 m in height. No modern aircraft is capable
of these silent maneuvers, nor of this degree of precision when landing. It is hard not to
imagine a piloted or remote-controlled flying machine, or else one having highly advanced
cybernetics.
The other French cases of close encounters described in Chapter 4 also strongly
suggest the existence of an intelligent [civilization] behind the UAP Ds. In the Valensole,
“Amaranth” and Cussac cases, once the witness or witnesses are brought face to face with
the UAP D, everything generally happens very quickly, and the object escapes without
having shown the slightest aggressiveness toward the witnesses.
7.6.5 Foreign Cases - Conclusion
The study of certain foreign cases leads to conclusions similar to those drawn from the
French cases. One may reread in this spirit the description of the aeronautical cases
presented in Chapter 2. We could also relate foreign cases of close encounters, such as
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic