Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Legal Handbook for FBI Special Agents — Part 2
Page 17
17 / 147
Manl-ID: LHBSAP1 LEGAL HANDBOOK FOR SPECIAL AGENTS PART 1
information. For example, Agents may receive reliable information
that an individual is engaged in illegal distribution of cocaine.
Although the information makes no reference to other items of
evidentiary value, the Agents may logically infer that one who engages
in that kind of criminal activity will also possess related items such
as packaging materials, large amounts of cash, records that would
identify names of sources and customers, etc. Such inferences can be
included in the probable cause statement to support the issuance of a
search warrant for all of the relevant items named. |
**EFFDte: 07/26/1999 MCRT#: 915 Div: D9 Cav: SecCls:
1-5 | COMMUNICATING THE FACTS|
**EFEDte: 07/26/1999 MCRT#: 915 Div: D9 Cav: SecCls:
1-5.1 |General
If Agents apply for a warrant to arrest or to
search, they must communicate the underlying facts to support the
issuance of the warrant (probable cause) to a magistrate judge who has
the authority to issue the warrant. If Agents make warrantless
arrests or conduct warrantless searches requiring probable cause, the
obligation to communicate the probable cause underlying the action
will arise thereafter. For example, following a warrantless arrest,
Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (FED.R.CRIM.P.)
requires that the arrestee be taken to the nearest available
magistrate judge without unnecessary delay, and that a Complaint be
filed. A Complaint is defined as "a written statement of the
essential facts constituting the offense charged." If Agents conduct
a warrantless search where probable cause is the legal prerequisite--
e.g., the Vehicle Exception--it is most likely that their assessment
of probable cause will be subsequently challenged by the defendant
during a suppression hearing. The important point is that whether
obtaining warrants, or justifying warrantless actions requiring
probable cause, Agents must be prepared to communicate the facts
supporting their determination that probable cause existed to support
the action taken. |
**EFEDte: 07/26/1999 MCRT#: 915 Div: D9 Cav: SecCls:
1-5.2 |Constitutional Requirements for Issuance of Warrants
The Fourth Amendment explicitly mandates that "no Warrants
shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or
Printed: 05/05/2004 13:08:54 Page 4
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic