Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Legal Handbook for FBI Special Agents — Part 2
Page 124
124 / 147
Manl-ID: LHBSAP1 LEGAL HANDBOOK FOR SPECIAL AGENTS PART 1
evidence in a case establishes that the defendant was predisposed to ~
commit the offense, however, the defense of entrapment will be
defeated.
(2) |Predisposition in Federal cases can be established
by many different types of evidence. Federal courts generally permit
the Government to introduce at trial the following types of
predisposition evidence as long as it is similar to the crime for
which the defendant is currently charged:
(a) Prior convictions. |
(b) Prior arrests. |
defendant is charged with selling a controlled substance. Prior to
the offense charged, he/she sold a similar substance to undercover
Agents.
(c) Preoffense criminal activity. For example, the
(d) Postoffense criminal activity. For example, the
defendant is charged with selling cocaine. A few months later he/she
attempts to sell another controlled substance to undercover Agents.
(e) A defendant's response to a Government —
inducement can also be considered as evidence of predisposition. A
defendant's ready and unhesitating acceptance of the Government's —
offer to commit a crime is substantial evidence that he/she was y
predisposed to do so.|
**EFEDte: 05/01/1985 MCRT#: O Div: D9 Cav: SecCls:
8-3.6 Governmental Participation
It should be noted that under the entrapment test used in
Federal courts, governmental involvement in the criminal activity does
not constitute entrapment if the defendant was predisposed to commit
the crime. For example, the Supreme Court has held there was no
entrapment in a prosecution for manufacturing narcotics, even though
an undercover agent supplied a predisposed defendant with an
ingredient essential to the manufacturing process. Merely furnishing
the opportunity to violate the law does not constitute entrapment.
Entrapment lies only when the Government induces a suspect to commit a
crime he/she is indisposed to commit.
**kEFEDte: 05/01/1985 MCRT#: O Div: D9 Cav: SecCls:
8-3.6.1 The Due Process Defense
(1) It is clear from the foregoing discussion that proof
SENS#AIVE
Printed: 05/05/2004 13:08:54 Page 6
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic