Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Legal Handbook for FBI Special Agents — Part 2
Page 120
120 / 147
Manl-ID: LHBSAP1 LEGAL HANDBOOK FOR SPECIAL AGENTS PART 1
When an FBI informant provides information concerning
planned criminal activity which is not within the investigative
jurisdiction of the FBI, the FBI should advise the law enforcement
agency having investigative jurisdiction. If the circumstances are
such that it is inadvisable to have the informant report directly to
the agency having investigative jurisdiction, the FBI, in cooperation
with that agency, may continue to operate the informant.
**EFEDte: 05/01/1985 MCRT#: 0 Div: D9 Cav: SecCls:
8-3 LEGAL LIMITATIONS
**EFEDte: 11/10/1988 MCRT#: O Div: D9 Cav: SecCls:
8-3.1 Entry to Premises
Any entry by an informant into premises protected by the
Fourth Amendment is illegal if the informant had no authority to
enter. For example, a surreptitious entry without the consent of the
suspect or another person with lawful possession of the property,
would be illegal and taint anything observed or overheard by the
informant while inside the premises. Conversely, if an informant is
invited into a suspect's residence, even though the invitation is
obtained after misrepresenting his/her identity and purpose, the
courts uniformly consider his/her presence lawful. The fact that
entry is gained by use of a ploy or ruse does not vitiate the
suspect's permission to enter. It follows that any incriminating
information developed by the informant, whether in the form of a
statement made by the suspect, or a physical item observed by the
informant, is lawfully developed and can be used by the Government
either to establish probable cause for the issuance of a warrant, or
as an element of proof at a criminal trial.
**kEFEDte: 11/10/1988 MCRT#: 0 Div: D9 Cav: SecCls:
8-3.2 Search and Seizure
As noted earlier, informants are considered agents of the
law enforcement officers for whom they work and are subject to the
same exclusionary rules imposed on the officers or agents who direct
them. Thus any evidence obtained or observed by the informant while
conducting an unreasonable search and seizure will likely be
inadmissible in a criminal prosecution against the party aggrieved by
the search. For a discussion of the general rules governing searches
and seizures, see Section 5, Search and Seizure.
**EFEDte: 11/10/1988 MCRT#: 0 Div: D9 Cav: SecCls:
s
Printed: 05/05/2004 13:08:54 Page 2
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic