◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

65 HS1 834228961 62 HQ 83894 Section 10

184 pages · May 10, 2026 · Document date: Aug 31, 1966 · Broad topic: General · Topic: 65_HS1-834228961_62-HQ-83894_Section_10 · 184 pages OCR'd
← Back to feed
of the 11,000 sightings ‘since 1947, did have some ex- planations. “The mysterious flaming object in the East was “probably a meteor.”’ As for Michigan's much- publicized and plentiful unidentified flying objects, they turned out to be monkeyshines instead of moonships: ‘Unidentified college boys”’ playing pranks with flares to frighten the girls in the dormitories, came the august report from a distinguished astronomer called in by the Air Force to investigate the Hillsdale af-_ fair. Every report of a ‘‘flying saucer” had ostensibly been checked out by the Air Force’s special squad known as “Project Blue Book,” al- though the staff was woefully small. Of the 10,147 sightings Since 1947, the Air Force insisted that only 646 remain unexplained — and most of these because of insufficient information. The others have been attributed to planes, balloons, astronomical causes, missiles; swamp gas, meteors, fireworks and, in some cases, to hallucinations and psychological reasons. Ball Lightning? Philip Klass, avionics edi- tor of Aviation Week & Space Technology magazine, recently proposed some other explanations. Klass, an electronics engineer, said a form of ‘‘ball lightning,’’ gen- erated by high tension power lines, could explain the phe- nomena. Many of the sightings, said Klass, occurred along or very near high-tension lines where luminous balls of ionized air could be generated under certain conditions. ‘No Threat’ The main _ conclusions reached by the Air Force were: e “No unidentified flying objects reported, investigat- ed and evaluated by the Air Force have ever given any in- dication of a threat to our national security.”’ e@ “There has been no ev- “dence submitted to or discov- ered by the Air Force that sightings represent techno- logical developments or prin- ciples beyond the range of present day scientific knowl- edge.” © “There has been no evi- dence that sightings catego- rized as unidentified are ex- traterrestrial vehicles.” Major Donald Keyhoe, however, was unconvinced. Major Keyhoe, USMC (re- tired), director of the Nation- al Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NI- CAP), a private space watch- ing organization, accused the Air Force of conducting a long-term whitewash on the UFO question. It was Keyhoe’s theory that the Air Force was with- holding information for fear of causing public panic. UFOs, insisted the Major, who had never seen one, were of extraterrestrial origin an2 the Air Force feared that the Sea — — —=... vv public could not accept this knowledge. ‘“‘They won’t give so é you details,’’ he complained. “If they did, many of their explanations would fall flat.” And Keyhoe could also claim a powerful ally in Michigan’s Gerald Ford, the House Republican leader, who suggested it would be ‘‘a very wholesome thing” for Congress to look into uniden- tified flying objects. Such an investigation. Ford suggest- d. would make the Ameri- can people ‘feel better.” Study in Depth Whether or not that was so, the Air Force last week took definite steps to make itself feel better. Fed up with in- vestigating reports of glow- ing, flying, zooming, wink- ing, awesome, blinking, streaking, hovering things, the Air Force last week de- cided to bail itself out of all responsibility for future con- clusions concerning UFOs. The Air Force announced that it had commissioned the University of Colorado to conduct an ‘‘in-depth” study of flying saucers for the next 18 months. The director of the study (expected to cost $300,000) would be Dr. Ed- ward U. Condon, former di- rector of the National Bureau of Standards, and now a physics professor at Colora- 0. To satisfy the skeptics, and insure the study’s objectivi- ty, Colorado would select several other universities to take part in the independent investigation, with about 100 scientists participating, And in case that wasn’t enough, the National Acade- my of Sciences also agreed to appoint a panel to review the Colorado report. ; = ~~
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 31
Jump straight to page 31 of 184.
Reader
65_HS1-834228961_62-HQ-83894_Section_10 Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the General archive hub and the more specific 65_HS1-834228961_62-HQ-83894_Section_10 topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
letter bureau
Related subtopics
John Murtha
57 documents · 1471 known pages
Subtopic
Sen Joseph Joe Mccarthy
42 documents · 2653 known pages
Subtopic
D B Cooper
41 documents · 13789 known pages
Subtopic
Kansas City Massacre
38 documents · 5300 known pages
Subtopic
Black Panther Party
36 documents · 3066 known pages
Subtopic
Malcolm X
36 documents · 3932 known pages
Subtopic