Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Kent State — Part 22
Page 130
130 / 159
CV 44-703
and relevance of each witness, each photograph, and any and
all physical evidence required degrees of competence, diligence
and dedication not always evident in attorneys in our
criminal justice system. However, it is the measured opinion
of the CV Office, based upon the almost daily contact with
ROBERT HURPHY and his colleagues since the Fall of 1973,
that HURPHY and each of his aboved-named colleagues brought
to the prosecution of this case the kind of professionalism
which would warrant their efforts being brought to the
attention of the Director. Accordingly, I recommend that
a letter be addressed over the Director's signature to
J. STANLEY POTTINGER, Assistant Attorney General, Civil
Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice, bringing to
his attention the individual efforts of his four employees
in connection with their participation in the prosecutive
proceedings of this case.
I feel that such a conmendation letter from the
Director would not suggest any implication or inference one
way or another in regard to the Bureau's opinion on the
decision to re-open and prosecute this matter or the outcome
which has brought this matter to a close.
a - é
It may be noted that the re-opening ol the” ¢
investigation of this matter and the subsequent Yecision
to seck presecution were accompanied by national ‘notoricty.
Also, the controversy attached to this case was not unlike
past such cases some of which have been characterized as
being "political" in nature. In this instance although
the Bureau was the prine investigating agency, the Bureau
has not been subject to any adverse criticism or publicity.
In their continuous contact with the case agcnt
in this matter, ench of the above Departmental officials has
expressed his high regard for the Bureau's work product and
Bureau personnel, and it is felt each would value such a
letter conccrning his association with one of the most
important, if not the most important, cases each has been
associated with.
CV possesses no information which would preclude
the preparation of such a letter,
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic