◆ SpookStack

t re TE epimers a ta are wget ge +i @ tant gy Memorandum to Mr. J. Edgar Hoover, ne ae, 7m Director, Division of Investigations February 7, 1954. 6- The following individuals, other than those already = named were recommended for indictment in connection with this case by the investigating officers, bat were not indicted by the, - grand jurys _. . a Joe Di ond 1560 E. 40th street,’ eB re Cg Cleveland, Ohio. . of TON Ls ae, H. £. Dayls 1402 Beacon street; Brookline, Mass. ° Charles F. Dgvis 1402 Beacon Street, Brookline, Mass. Ae J. stdprine 20 Vestwood Street, os Vie Newton, Mass. . 7. The headquarters' file in this case faiis to dis- close the criminal record of the defendants. It is probable that - such information is available in the field file at the office of the Acting Investigator in Charge in Boston. . 8. With the exception of the defendants Frank A. Farrell, Joe Diamond and Jos» McAvoy, all of those involved in the case were members. of the snugzling combination headed by Moss, Carbone and Gauthier, who, at the time of the indictment, were | operating in the New England area, The defendant Farrell was-a bootlegger in Buffelo, New York; Joe Diamond was engaged in the liquor business in Cleveland, Joseph McAvoy in the same business 4n Detroit. All were on the receiving end of shipments of — smuggled liquor made by sone of the other defendants in the New ~:~: England areas. 4s far as the reports show, none of the liquor was -- unloaded on the Connecticut shore nor shipped from the State of . ; Connecticut. The evidence discloses that most of the snuggling - and the shipments took place at points in Rhode Telend and Massa- ~ chusette. ; ; Sot 9. The case report does not disclose thet Albert Silver man was in any wise associated with the defendants in this case, .- either under his own neme or under any alias. I have today - called the Boston Office in an endeavor to learn if the field file shoved eny connection of Silverman with any of these defendants,