◆ SpookStack

"Tt was raised before the Suprene Court tn the petitton for rehearing which was dented, Assuming without dectston that ay now be read ta tts + a an. a ee ) never theless 3 e “under Section 2255, we hold that tt ta without merit.” (65-58236 | | On January #, 1953, ‘Judge Irving R, Koufacn, Dtetrtes Court, dented the application of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg for clenency,. Zn the course of his optnton, Judge Xoufacn stated as follows: "In response to thie application, I have not only heard counsel at great Length and studied the defendants’ petition, dut also have rewstudied the volumtnous record af the trial and refreshed my recollection of the demeanor of the witnesses, Re-exzamining the question de nevo, I am agatn coupel to conclude that the defendants * gutit = as found by the unanine verdict of the jury ~- was established beyond doubt. Mone of tha so-called later discovertes or revelattons which counsel contend created doubt of guilt touch the baste matters disclosed by the testimony of Ruth and David Greenglass, Maz Eittcher, Ben | and the ether Governnent witnesses, mhomthe jury chos to belteve and which peints unatatakably te the full and conscis partictpatton of the defendants tn this conspirscy. On thie application baseless charges of perjury have been hurled et seve “Government witnesses. The jury kas already decided this questto te the contrary, so did my colleague Judge Ryan, so did the - 116