Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
John Jake the Barber Factor — Part 1
Page 17
17 / 60
ce | ate ne came ee cee em a ae ae
CG 62-4098 —_ bie
‘2, oom
a ee ny rr 4 mute
. won oe
wa Facts o- ,.. By telegra ted July 24, 1933, captioned
: ote ET AL; KIDNAPING", the =. ~
7 eau was advised that all subjects were.
that day brought from Elkhorn to Milwaukee, Wisconsin, after...
warrants were served on them by a deputy United States ~ - Tse
Marshal, and that they were being held separately in the..*..-"..
County Jail at Milwaukee, 99 0 2 a
Nothing was found in the files concerning the - ~~
subjects’ visiting privileges or the degree of security Te
enforced. They might well have been held in maximum security
inasmuch as they were charged with kidnaping. ;
: Whether or not their attorney was permitted to
confer with them is not reflected in the files. However, —¢
the newspapers referred to under item 2 above, report that.
Attorney W. SCOTT STEWART was actively representing them ,
in Elkhorn, Wisconsin, and in Chicago on July 20-21, 1933.
to the Bureau dated July 31, 1933,
captioned ROGER TOUHY, Was.; ET AL; WILLIAM |
HAMM, Jr. = ; APING' stated: ~*~ = ~~ DAY.
"] received a call today from Scott Stewart, who |
is the attorney for Roger Touhy, et al, in connection with an
the Hamm kidnaping case. He stated that he would be unable
to appear at a hearing on August 4th and that he would like
to have a continuance for a period of ten days after that.
He stated that he was unable to attend this hearing, in view
of the fact that he would be engaged in a trial at that time. .
He stated further that he had talked to Mr. Koelzer, the |
Assistant United States Attorney at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, who.
had informed him that this was agreeable to him. In addition,
he stated that he planned to submit to me all of his alibi
evidence, inasmuch as he was convinced that the prisoners now >
Te “4 im custody were not guilty of the Hamm kidnaping." | + el
- It would seem that STEWART must have had some ©. ~
conference with his clients in order to have alibi evidence,
for his original leads into that evidence would have had to
have been suggested by TOUHY, et al..
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic