◆ SpookStack

fa eae 4 . at Atte» Uh Any \ ta Mes ot Chicago File 458-194 | PCD/ALM :mel LOUIS CAMPAGNA, and that he complied with the request of Mrs. CAMPAGNA and ena advised the Parole Board that he felt that if LOUIS CAMPAGNA were given a. © 248," vt 7 parole, that he would find a suitable place in society. Father CANNING further \/ | stated that he was offered no monetary reward for his letter on behalf of ~ . * Noor CAMPAGNA, and neither was he coerced or induced to write the same. OTE, Father CANNING further advised that after CAMPAGNA's release on parole he had ',’, a conversation with CAHMPACNA, during which time he asked him who PAUL DILLON © « ; was, and CAIPAGN, stated "he would net know DILLON if DILLON walked into the -.. room'. Durins this conversation between Father CANNING and CAMPAGNA, (9° (7 "87. CAMPACIA advised him, when directly questioned, that he knew of no influence ;.‘' exerted to secure his parole. Father CANNING advised that he had not been = * subpoenaed to appear before the investigating body into the paroles of the . 6-4) subjects in this case, and stated that he would welcome an opportunity to.so ...* appeare Father CAYNING concluled by stating that he felt that it was his ant spiritual obligation to intercede on behalf of CAMPAGNA, and advised that he was under obligation to no one by virtue of his intercession for CAMPAGNA>+ Father CANTING advised that he felt very strongly against whom he termed” =‘: "> nSniveling Reporters" with reference to the recent adverse publicity he has ks : received in connection with this case. Father CANNING voluntarily exhibited’ -T’"" , - to agents an anonymous letter apparently submitted by a parishioner of +. Regt a, Father CANNING's Parish, wherein the anonymous individual berated Father © 7 She CANNING for his part in the release of CAJPAGNA; and concluded by stating that 3\« the anonymous writer was withdrawing from the Parish as a result of the <° publicity involving Father CANNING in the release of CAMPAGHNA. “