Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
John Murtha — Part 28
Page 47
47 / 137
47
14. Did the government's agents perjure themselves
by false. reports to the police, to a judge, or to a grand
jury?
15. Did the activities of the agents actually
harm innocent citizens not the subject of the investigation?
e
16. Did the activities of the government agents
have any direct adverse social consequences?
17. Did the undercover agents stand by while _
crimes were being committed in their presence?
18. What was the value to law enforcement of
the information being obtained by the informant and under-
cover agents?
19.- How important was the crime and its detection
in the overall social scheme? —
20. How closely were the informant's activities
supervised by the government agents?
21. Was the claimed outrageous conduct of the
agents, an isolated instance, or was it part of a widespread
and continuous system? -
22. Did the investigative technique complained
of produce a substantial danger of unreliability and thereby
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic