◆ SpookStack

on, ‘ of acquittal be entered on their behalf. 501 F Supp at 1204. Although Judge Fullam accepted the propriety of undercover agents using a business entity, real or imagi- nary, as an attractive target for corrupt overtures by city officials. even with hints that such overtures would be welcome, he concluded that “it is neither necessary nor appropriate to the task of ferreting out crime for the undercover agents to initiate bribe offers, provide extremely generous financial inducements, and add further incentives virtually amounting to an appeal to civic duty.” 501 F Supp at 1204. He also thought it permissible for undercover agents to initiate bribe proposals "at least in connection with suspected ongoing corrupt activities on the part of the targeted officials." Id. As previously indicated, this court is not directly controlled by Twigg. To the extent that Judge Fullam found due process violations in the undercover agents offering bribe proposals in the absence of "suspected ongoing corrupt activities on the part of the targeted officials" this - court respectfully disagrees. US v. Ordner, supra, 554 F2d 24 (CA2 1977). If the “appeal to civic duty" directed at Schwartz: ‘and Jannotti was essential to Judge Fullam's conclusion,