◆ SpookStack

0? however, when the agents testified that they -did not recall an incident, their lack of recollection did not appear to be unreasonable or deliberate. The questioning of the agents was intensive, focusing frequently on many irrelevant details, and covering many circumstances that an agent might reasonably forget. : The investigation had covered many months and. included: hundreds of meetings and conversations with a large number of people. It used electronically recorded conversations as the primary means for record-keeping, thereby greatly relieving agents of the need for careful recall of many events. Moreover, particularly with Weinberg and Amoroso, the undercover operatives were dealing with a number of fictitious stories that varied from subject to subject. Keeping them straight at the time must have been. severely taxing. To fully recall them all several months Later, in proper sequence and with the minute detail demanded by defense counsel, would have been impossible. The court detected no signs of evasiveness on the part of the agents. Or Weinberg. When they answered "I don't know" or ny don't recall" the court was satisfied that they were truly reflect- ing their actual recollections at the time. id