Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
John L Lewis — Part 30
Page 53
53 / 81
| as fused ‘to migh such waivers sOd
; threatened to certify them as Ger
‘To Eye Lewis careniened 1, 4
discharge them under closed oat.
tracts. i
Bay United Press thea was the cause for
A Federal Grend Jury wil belrecent sutomobile trip to that
asked soon ta dejesmine whether|mining ares. The Wip i wider;
te determine
2 President John Lo Lewis, pf the OPA investigation
United Mine Workers, and)}Mine ration! es '
B. coal Co., Springfield, Tl, vieyp ~~ Bihar
lated the civil rights statute in
g350,000 transaction, i+ Wes
annie
learned yesterday.
Reliable sources sald that «an
inquiry by the Federal Bureau of.
Investigation was ebovt com:
pieted, and that the matter would
be placed before a Federal grand
jury here or at Springfield.
; Justice Department officials de
clined te comment.
Wagner Act Invetred
It would be up to the grand
jury te determine whetber the
transaction warrants an indict-
ment far conspiracy to violate the
- Tight of{Mine B. empicyes to bar- .
gain ofliectively—e right guaran
teed them by the Wagner Act. .
Conviction on charges of inter
fering Wiin an indiviauss’s rights
resulted im a decision that no vio| .
years imprisonment and $16,000
fine.
Lewis, it was said, loaned or
made em gift of about $350,000 to
Mine B. Cos! Co., in 1938, alleged-
Iy to cover losses of the company
lin w lockout of its toyes who
were members of the) Progreasive
Mine Workers (AFL). The Gov-
ernment it expected to allege that
the purnote was to break the APL
union, Which Tesulted from « split
with the UMW in 1932, and per-
mit Lewis to regain cootrol over
the miners. :
‘Tax Barean Bares Case
ternal Revenue Buread ‘
first discovered evidence of the
transaction during sn investiga-
tlon into a possible income tax
case. However, a study reportedly
resulted in e decision that no vio-
tation of the tax laws was in
volved.
4 Aa far as is Known, this is only
‘the second time that the civil °
‘yights statute has been applied to
cover an alleged violation of the
Wagner Act. A Brookkn (N. ¥.
Federal grapd jury in May indict
ed two baking companies, two of
thetr offictals, and two officers of
the akery atd Confectionery
Workers International Union
4AFL) on charge of gonspiring to
injure employes of th
in the exercise of
jted under the
Act
oa LES
Fair Labor, \\0.
Employes Threatened
In the Brooklyn case St was,
_ feharged that the defendants con-, -
/ puepired to threaten with discharge, s
{"] intimidate employ ok
signed waivers of
GO SEP literitetin er meed|
COnETAST
pan \ ¢ : z .
7 the) ey st et soi ten be atl Lagat’
Mr. Cleat...
of” (as. Gavia.
Mr. Nishels_ ww:
Mr. Resea
Mr. Treey
Mr. Carson
Mr. Coffey
Mr. Hendon___ ~
Mr. Kramer.
Mr. McGuire
Mr. Quinn Tama
Mr, Nease
Mise Gandy
WASHINGTON TIMES-HERALD
oe
=
te
bd
a
%
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic