◆ SpookStack

- ly - bee filing his denial to the allegations and then having agreed to allow a court to enter a decr C) urisdiotion G1 the court. : Tequiry sho d to asoce Ne ; ' rp S2 ws (a) What motivated Elshoff to sign the stipulation 10% in the first place? (b} Did he intend merely to gain more time for Tnited and postpones muy formal order or the board? (o} Did Elshoff ever intend that the ProgressiveS should benefit by the stipulationt After the mine reopened, the following unfair laber practices were alleged; fat 22, ~~ a (1) From November 6, 1939, to March, 1941, Elshoff Continued to Refuse to Bargain in Good F ai th with the progressives. The following NLRB photostats indicate the nature of the Progressives' allegations in this respects D-S original memo from G. Le Patterson, Director, 13th Reg, to Ale ander B, Hawes, Chief admini-~ strative Examiner, dated Oot. 5, 1940, 3 pages. D-11 original letter from John Kane, Gen, Counsel Dist. No. 1, PMA to NLRB, 13th Reg., Chicago, re XIII-c-475, dated Dec, 15, 1939. \vY D-9 Original memo from Ge Le Patterson, Director, 13th Reg. {9 Nathan Witt, Secretary, dated Aug. 2, 1940. 2 pagese | 4 ¥ o Copy of letter fram Edmundson, Prée Dise Noe 12 UMWA, to Mr. Ave iserson, field examiner, D-23 Letter from J. e¥fancher, Vice President, Progressive Mine Workers of America, Dist. No. 1, to Mr. orSa%smith, Field Examiner, NLRB 13th Region, Chicago, dated (undated). ‘“< Decé Original memo from Leonard C. Ba jork to Wathag Executive Seoretary, NLRB, «e Mine B Coal -854, dated October 4, 1936.