Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
J Edgar Hoover — Part 20
Page 7
7 / 47
or re
enn nn nen nee Ne Ee OL ee RP ee
wae ee Se ee
situated, and the date when the family first settled there.
So during the several trips that my father and I took to-
gether that summer, I brought back a dozen or more stones
and made them the basis of an “Ancestral Walk”. My sons
and [ with hammers and cold chisels carved the names,
places, and dates on these stones and set them in the walk.
Since we were not masons and did not know how to carve
well, our lettering was as crude as could be found on the
tombstones in any old New England church-yard.
This walk was naturally interesting to my family and
friends, but who else could get very much excited over a
row of stones carved with such old New England family
names as Holt, Bowen, Ehot, Corbin, Chandler, Aspinwall,
Eaton, Tappan, etc. It then occurred to me to collect stones
from the homes of men and women whose names would be
known to everybody and fit them into another walk on
my farm.
Therefore, the next summer when my calleague, Pro-
fessor A. J. Hanna, and I were motoring through New
England raising money for Rollins, we decided to start a.
collection of stones from the homes of celebrities. Thus if
we saw a sign at a crossroads pointing to the right and
saying “one mile to the birthplace” of Daniel Webster, or
Franklin Pierce, or Ralph Waldo Emerson, we would detour
down that read and obtain a stone.
After we had collected about twenty stones, the great
moral deBate began. Collecting, I fear, is something of a
selfish, Han-glorious, exhibitionist, and egocentric pursuit
{note | every collector “gloats” over his collections and
with wpatpride he insists on showing them to all and sundry
who visit Mm). So Mrs. Holt and I had many a debate a3
to whether or not we should keep these stoncs for oursclves
or donate them to Rollins College. Finally generosity pre--
vailed and we presented them to Rollins, Then we dis-
covered what everybody discovers who puts the precept
into practice—that while it is blessed to receive, it is more
blessed to give. Accordingly I found my interest in develop-
ing the “Walk of Fame” at Rollins to be far more absorbing
than would have been my interest in developing the same
walk on my own homestead.
That nucleus of some twenty stones that we got the
4
t
'
AO RR TE pt me ey oe
first year has now grown to about 600, and more are com-
ing in almost every day. We have to make it an invariable
rule that only stones of nationally or internationally known
men and women can be admitted to the Walk—no local
celebrities. For instance, we would accept no stone from
the home of an eminent Floridian who woud noc be similarly
known in Maine or Oregon, and no stone from Massachue
setts that would not be known in ‘Texas. Of course there is
a borderline, but as a rule we accept stones from only the
homes of men and women whose names come up, or nearly
come up, to being “household-words.” I find, even so, that
some of the stones are seldom known by our visitors, though
they ought to be. For instance, almost no visitor to the
Watk knows that Paul Morphy of New Orleans was the
greatest chess player that ever lived, that Professor, Willard
Gibbs of Yale was undoubtedly the greatest modded mathe-
matician of pre-Kinstein times, or that Doctor Morton of
Sterling, Massachusetts, discovered ether (my father told
me that when my grandfather, the old country doctor, heard
of the discovery of ether, he wept to think that he would
never have to torture people again when operating on them).
I was once explaining the Walk to a large group of students,
and when I came to the Adelina Patti stone 1 asked how
many had never heard of her. About thirty hands were
raised. .
Everybody at Rollins is now a committee of one to
bring in stones. 1 think we have virtually all of the Ameri-
cans of undisputed first rank, and we have all but about 30
or 40 of those of the second rank. All the Presidents and
Chief Justices of the United States are repreedated and half
the Signers of the Declaration of Independengt. But Kings
and United States Senators are not admifted ex-officio,
They have to be Kings and Senators plus. :-Carmen Sylva,
Queen of Roumania, Mary Qucen of Scots, Senators Elihu
Root and Charles Sumner are typical exceptions that prove
the rule, Already we have many stones from forcign coun-
tries, but this is a field which naturally is nowhere nearly so
complete as is our collection from the United States,
It is @ curious fact that only two men of the 600 in the
“Walk of Fame” got there as a result of material achieve-
ment and success, These are Rockefeller and Carnegie,
5
‘bela. Sata Ls ae
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic