Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Howard Zinn — Part 1
Page 210
210 / 249
a
CAN WE WITHDRAW? q@ two By Howard Zim QQ a
Withdrawal can ™ake place gracefully, even “provdl y, with the United States
explaining to the world that we don't have to withdraw,.but we choose to do so,
voluntarily, because we think that would be in the best interests of the people of
the United States and the people of Vietnam. : In my book, Vietwam: The logic of
Withdrawal, .I have written a speech for LBJ-to ‘deliver over national television,
explaining. to the American people why we should withdraw. Here I can only briefly
answer somie of the common objections to this ‘proposal: 1. Don!t ‘we have a commitmer
“to defend Vietnam against ageres sion? Yes. But Vietnam is not thé victim of an
attack from outside, This is why the analogy with Czechoslovakia and the: Munich
Pact is false: Germany at that time was trying to take over another country; the
Viet Cong.today are trying to take over their owm country.. ‘What we have hére is a
popular revolution that started inside South Vietnam, against the dictatorship of
Diem. The United States, ‘just as it had helped the French in their.war to keep
control. of Vietnam, supported Diem, and then Ky, in fighting the rebellion. None
-of the regimes we supported has. been popular in Vietnam; that is why the American
Army has had to take over the war.
North Vietnam has never supvlied more than a ‘small fraction of the.manpower
for this rebellion; 80% to 90% off’ the Viet Cong are South Vietnamese peasants: Wh
the North. Vietnamese sent their first battalion (400 men) into the South to join’
. 140,000 South Vietnamese rebels, the United States already ‘had 35,000. soldiers in
Vietnam.- When.Hanoi had 14,000 soldiers in the South (still less than 10% of the
rebels) the United States had 170,000 soldiers there, according to (Majority
Leader) Mansfield's. report to the U.S. Senate. The "other side" consists of South
Vietnamese whose main interest is nationalism, not communism; fighting to subdue
them is a force largely American. To most Vietnamese, Americans -have replaced |
the French as:an occupying power in their: country. -. Wouldn't.we feel: the.same resé:
ment if we were in tleir position,? . ' Lo tee a ;
2. But aren't the Viet Cong Corimuni sts? . Undoubtedly many of the leaders”
are. But most are ordinary Vietnamese peasants who. will follow anyone's lead -=—
Communist. or not -- against. a regime controlled by wealthy landlords and supported
by foreign soldiers... Remember, these Communists on the other side are Vietnamese
Communists ~~ not Russian or Chinese or any other kind. They are fighting in —
their own country, and with a good deal of popular support.
A recent scholarly. study by a U.S. Information Agency man in Vietnam describe
the Viet Cong as the most effective grass roots otganization in Vietnamese history
Must we not recognize that in some areas of the world, at ceftain times, a Communi
led movement may be more popular than the people we are trying to keep in power?
And if this is'’so, do we. have the right to impose there a government the people
don't want because we prefer an anti-communist government? Why cannot we-get
along with a Communist’ government in Vietnam, just as we are” beginning to get &lor
with Poland, Yugoslavia, and even Soviet Russia.
3. But if Vietnam goes Communist, will this not lead to the victory of of
communists in the rest of Southeast Asia, and in other parts of the world?
This argument is based on a misunderstanding of Communist ideology, and a mis~
reading of history. Marxist theory asserts that it is the-internal and social
and economic conditions that wiil produce in any country a Communist revolution,
that it cannot be exported by arms from one -country to.another, (This does not
rule out the idea of helping a domestic revolution, but this is common to all
revolutionary situations; in the American Revolution for instance, the colonists
received heavy aid from the French.) Communism came to Russia, to China, to
Yugoslavia, to Cuba because of internal grievances, not from the outside. This
suggests that the best way to prevent communism from spreading is to help people
in various parts of the world build stable, free, democratic Societies, and where
we fail to do this, military forces will not help.
‘In FACT, there is not any better way to guarentee the growth of communism
tian to create war conditions in unstable countries. -Look how ‘the. Viet Cong has -
grown from a force of 60,000 to a force of 260,000 just. since we escalated the
war in Vietnam. Look how Communist guerrilla activity. in Thailand has grown
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic